• trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    The problem with labour hours is that it doesn’t compensate for more (or less) hard or unpleasant work.

      • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Untill you realize that there are a lot of kinds of work and solutions them into three groups is nooit fair to a lot of them either. You can keep cutting it up in smaller equivalents, but in the end what you’ll have is basically money.

        • bearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          That’s fine if you believe that. I don’t really believe that we need money, but as long as the means of production remain socialized, private profit remains impossible, unjustifiable heirarchies are dismantled, and decisions are made through direct democracy and consensus decision making, there’s a solid basis for a functioning anarchist society.

          • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            I’m not a communist so i don’t necessarily see a problem with private property, as long as there is a limit on the accumulation of it and a stop on avoiding responsibility for a companies actions.