• pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Actually, they are. As far as the average conservative cares, both of them are dirty pests that should be driven away.

      • Typhoon@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        And under no circumstances should you feed them or they’ll become dependent on you and keep coming back. It’s better to let them die.

      • Aljernon@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re not wrong but people gotta defecate and frequently have no where to do it. If we cared for our people, with housing in this case, it would benefit literally everyone else too.

      • Lucelu2@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You could also petition the city for public toilets to be available for homeless people. I mean, every construction site/ public festival I see those aqua blue porta potties. I bet they would rather shit in one of them since no public facility/business will let them in to do that. Everyone poops. Even dogs, pigeons, rabbists, racoons and deer.

      • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The difference is if you build public bathrooms, the pigeons won’t use them. If humans are shitting outside to a degree it becomes a problem, the problem isn’t the people doing the shitting.

        Now, if we could get pigeons to use a bathroom, or even a shitting mat, that would be an achievement.