• DevDave@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I have no artistic skills so freebie: Arch is like Russian roulette where the odds are good but there is still a non-zero chance some update is going to shit the bed. I don’t even know how to convey that in meme form either.

  • kionay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The user interface on the left and the command prompt on the right does kinda highlight a barrier to mass Linux adoption.

    if we want more people on Linux let’s normalize not having to use the command line for everything.

    • regdog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The left side says “Updates are happening, whether you want to or not” and the right side says “'Give me some updates, please”

    • sonofearth@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That is not the barrier. Most people stick to defaults and don’t know how to install an OS. When any person switches, they will try to learn an adapt. If it is a shitty experience, they will switch back to defaults. Updating your system through command line is not a shitty experience.

      • Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Some of the gen zers I come across can’t even double click an icon on PC.

        There’s no reason not to have an update button somewhere.

        • sonofearth@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Absolutely but it is not easy. It needs to have several layers of abstraction by hiding what packages are being updated and auto approving themselves without prompting for password. There should be an automatic rollback mechanism in place in case an update goes bad. Some programs will need to auto-update themselves as users would expect like google chrome, firefox — which I don’t think we currently have other than steam. Otherwise if a person skips an update, they will leave their system vulnerable to the security bugs in browsers.

      • kionay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That is not the barrier.

        who said there is only one barrier?

        they will try to learn an[d] adapt

        you will, sure, but no not everyone will. think less on tech savvy people and more on those that know that “the Internet is the big blue e when I turn on the computer (their monitor)”

        those people outnumber us tech savvy individuals at least two-to-one and they deserve an OS that is easier to use then memorizing command line commands

  • ian@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s clear why many Windows users won’t switch to Linux, when people show them they’d need to use strange IT tools to use it. While, annoying, Windows doesnt need you to be an IT nerd. Linux doesn’t either, but to people outside of the Linux bubble, this is how it gets presented. That Windows update sure looks easier than some manual hack.

      • Ooops@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Is it even apt-get still? thought they changed over to apt long ago and apt-get is just a symlink for legacy reasons.

        At least that’s what I last read… (speaking as someone also loving candy) .

          • MsFlammkuchen@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            apt is meant more for user interaction and apt-get is more stable and more for scripting. But apt-get is often used in online tutorials because it doesn’t really change.

            • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I think it wasn’t for APT but I once worked for a business with a lot of RHEL, the script that was updating hundreds of servers was using the user wrapper instead of the binaries. A warning was displayed in the script to warn not to use the wrapper for scripts.

              I warned my team leader of the issue and was completely ignored and was said that it was an issue for the team that made the script in the first place.

              I gave up.

              A few weeks later, the poorly designed script botched a major update on hundred of servers because the wrapper had a tiny change and the update script didn’t handle it well.

              It’s insane to me how much money a business can waste for stupid shit like that. The devs warned us not to use their wrapper to script on, the linux team did it anyway, my warning was ignored, many hours of engineers work was wasted fixing the chaos that ensued.

  • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    sudo guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm

    Then you don’t even have to worry about what happens when an evil monkey unplugs your computer in the middle of an update.

  • red_tomato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s all fun and games until you one day you see:

    E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

    And it’s complaining about packages you’ve never heard of before.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Linux noob here. Just upgraded hardware and reinstalled Windows and Linux on the gaming computers and even though I’m a complete Linux beginner, 9 out of 10 software issues were with windows! I couldn’t believe a gazzilion dollar company with thousands of employees still couldn’t get it right?

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I reinstalled Windows 11 a while ago because of a software I struggled to get working on Linux (the adobe installer patches for WINE have since resolved that) and I had no idea how annoying the installation process is. You had to babysit it, and tell it your life’s story. Not to mention the amount of times it asked me to sign up for MS 365 and OneDrive. In the end, it enabled OneDrive anyway, despite me telling it to sod off at least half a dozen times.

      And that’s just the install process. Using it is another beast entirely. Why do I need to accept a UAC prompt just to open a browser? Why does the browser need to update itself every time I boot the OS?

      Why do I have to hunt all over the internet for basic stuff that should come with the OS itself? Even when I used an NVidia card I didn’t have to faff around with some stupid third party software to handle drivers, it was just there. Sure it broke all the time because NVidia is a garbage company, but it was right there!