• curiousaur@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is just logically wrong.

    If birth control was only made for men, and 90% of men were on birth control, you could end up with far more pregnancies than if it’s for women and 90% of women were on it.

    The conclusion is exactly the opposite of the argument.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t understand you logic. Are you saying the remaining 10% of men would impregnate a disproportionate amount of women?

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yes. Because 10% of men is enough to impregnate all the women.

        As a guy though, I wish there was male birth control. I do not love that women get to decide if they are going to make me a father or not.

        • Sadbutdru@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean there’s condoms, and there’s not ejaculating inside women. If you don’t want the risk of being a father, those are things you can control.