• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bear in mind that LOTR started out as a sequel to a children’s book, and changed into something else about halfway through FOTR. So you’re literally reading the epic fantasy genre being born on the page in front of you.

    • hakase@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      While technically true, I feel that this is a bit of a misnomer. Even though LotR is usually considered the archetypal example of “epic/high fantasy”, based on the other most popular works in the genre I think that LotR (and the rest of the non-Hobbit legendarium) is better described as “myth”, and I think that fans of epic/high fantasy coming to Tolkien are often disappointed for this reason.

      For me the disappointment went the other direction - I read LotR first, and then I went on a fantasy reading binge and was repeatedly let down because I couldn’t understand why none of it felt like Tolkien.

    • rowrowrowyourboat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I did read The Hobbit and enjoyed it quite a bit. It felt much smoother.

      Also read his short stories “Farmer Giles of Ham” and “Leaf by Niggle”.