A British judge has sentenced four Palestine Action protesters as terrorists, handing them custodial sentences ranging from four to eight years.

The unprecedented ruling came despite jurors convicting them of criminal charges not connected to terrorism during the prosecution.

On Friday, the presiding judge, Justice Jeremy Johnson, added a “terrorism connection” to their offences.

In a preliminary ruling in March 2025, Johnson found an “appearance” of a terrorism connection in the case, as he said the activists were attempting to influence the Israeli government by restricting their access to weapons. This information was withheld from the jury who convicted them.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    The unprecedented ruling came despite jurors convicting them of criminal charges not connected to terrorism during the prosecution.

    On Friday, the presiding judge, Justice Jeremy Johnson, added a “terrorism connection” to their offences.

    Rule Of Law my ass!

  • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    If spray painting a plane is the exact same as blowing it up then might as well blow it up.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    The only terrorists are the regime of the UK that support actual terrorists and choose to terrorize their own citizens to protect them.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Terror is in interesting word, it used to mean a government that oppressed their citizens, then it changed to mean general attacks on civillians but a non government entity.

    And now, it means protesting specific government policies.

    The first meanings are understandable, they involve harming civillians.

    The new definition is just idiotic.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Britain should just follow Doggerland’s example. Aside from spotted dick, nothing of value would be lost.

    /s.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    If you do anything to oppose genocide you’re a terrorist. If you support genocide the red carpet is rolled out for you in the West.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      That’s because the Middle East Eye is directly run by Qatar’s embassy in London.

      Citation needed.

      Also, please elaborate on exactly why, even if it were true, that would be so fucking scary.

    • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Are you suggesting Middle East Eye is secretly run by Zionists or Israel itself in an effort to further drive antisemitism? Similar to the way Evangelical Christianity grows stronger the more its adherents feel persecuted, one of the goals of Zionism is to increase antisemitic sentiment to make more Jewish people feel they have no safe place in the world other than to move to Israel? Interesting, I hadn’t considered this. /s?

    • wpb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Jesus christ, every time with this guy. Can you please try not to be so fucking obvious? The guardian is just as biased as MEE, the only difference is that their bias is in favor of Israel instead. You sound like a raging islamophobe btw.

  • root@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    disarming israel is terrorism? yayyy were all terrorists because that term means nothing now

  • masinko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Adding an offence later in the case and withholding information to a jury has to be grounds a mistrial.

  • detren@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    How does wanting to disarm a foreign government terrorism?? By that logic the entirety of the UK government is a bunch of terrorists for wanting to disarm uh Russia and Iran I assume?

    UK has stopped making sense a long time ago

  • 7rokhym@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Such a standard to be met:

    He added that those convicted acted “for the purpose of advancing a political and/or ideological cause”.

    Guess the legal system has no standards.

    • Talentless Sculptor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I thought the standard was " the activists were attempting to influence the Israeli government by restricting their access to weapons."?

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      It does mean something, just not what’s in the dictionary. The definition: “The use of violence or the threat of violence, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political goals.” Based on that, police are constantly using terrorism, but they’re almost never said to be. The state has a monopoly on violence. Terrorism is just a term they use to support that. You acting against the state?" Terrorism." The state acting against you?" Justice."

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Yeah, that’s my point. Terrorism is just whatever the state doesn’t like at this point. The dictionary definition has no relation to the definition they use.

    • neobunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Ironically, it means the same it has always meant: resistance to colonization/imperialism/opression, it’s just that in the past it was disguised with the veil of “civilization”, and now the mask is off and you can see the naked brutal truth of how the term has always been weaponized

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s literally a disinhibitive ruling. Someone somewhere will inevitably think “well if I’m going to be called a terrorist anyway for some property damage, why not shoot at the cop that’s coming to stop me? In for a penny in for a pound.”