الله@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 22 days agoShould we have empathy & free speech for "bigots"?message-squaremessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1message-squareShould we have empathy & free speech for "bigots"?الله@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 22 days agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squareالله@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·22 days agoThere are no universally agreed legal definitions of “intolerance” or “hate speech”.
minus-squareeinkorn@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·22 days agoIf you require a universally agreed upon legal definition of what is right or wrong you might do well reading some books on philosophy. Or pickup a random religious text and live by it if that’s what you prefer.
minus-squareالله@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·22 days agoThere is no universally agreed-upon legal definition of “right” or “wrong.”
minus-squareeinkorn@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·22 days agoThat’s exactly my point and the reason I think your reliance on a “universally agreed legal definition” is useless.
There are no universally agreed legal definitions of “intolerance” or “hate speech”.
If you require a universally agreed upon legal definition of what is right or wrong you might do well reading some books on philosophy. Or pickup a random religious text and live by it if that’s what you prefer.
There is no universally agreed-upon legal definition of “right” or “wrong.”
That’s exactly my point and the reason I think your reliance on a “universally agreed legal definition” is useless.