If you are subscribed to Starlink (internet), what is it like when relying on satellite connection for both online live service play (as in multiplayer) and casual gaming? I’ve heard that star link internet sucks, is the subscription even worth the money? How well does satellite connection hold up in comparison to oceanic fiber optic cable internet? (Which is the most common form of connecting for the majority as it’s been around longer).
You must log in or # to comment.
The comparison to subsea cables can’t be made yet, because Starlink doesn’t work that way yet. You are routed up to a reachable satellite maybe at most one or two hops over the inter satellite laser links to other satellites (but it’s hard to confirm anything concrete), and then quickly back down to the next reachable ground station. From there it’s fiberoptics.
I’m probably wrong but I recall ping times were like 200ms or something? I’ve played with worse but it wasn’t awesome. I’m too lazy to Google it though so grain of salt and whatnot
You are probably thinking of ping times on the old satellite internet services. Those were terrible , barely better than dialup. Starlink is LEO so ping is much better
I use it (begrudgingly, but options out here suck), you’re wrong. It’s closer to 70-80ms at worst. Though it has definitely improved over time, it may have been worse during the early beta.
That sounds more accurate honestly. I’ve never had it but read about it in regards to this years ago. Honestly that’s doable if you can swallow it.
Casual MMOs? Sure.
Counterstrike tournaments? Nope.
Those of us subscribed to Starlink aren’t here because we have options. Honestly, it’s decent. IIRC it’s $110/mo for on average 300 down 15 up. Is that amazing? No. Is fiber better? Yes. But they’re not marketing to people who have fiber as an option. They’re marketing to people like me, who used to pay $460/mo for 60/15 microwave internet with frequent downtime -and- data caps. If you have to ask “but which one is better”, the simple answer is generally fiber > starlink > cable > microwave > dsl/satellite > dialup. And I refuse to rank 5G service because that depends on too many factors.
60/15 for $460/no? What the actual shit? Even in my country where things tend to be more expensive than others in the continent, the internet is WAY cheaper.
Oh, that was absolute highway robbery. But we had no other options and they knew it. They robbed us blind, and we dropped them the instant starlink became available.
Where do you live that any of these prices are affordable or reasonable?
Nevada, USA
Insanity. Prices are just unbelieveable. I have never seen 100+€ for any monthly rate ever for any telecomms service.
$460/mo, holy hell!
Starlink cannot be better than cable for gaming. You’re gonna get double across the world pings even if what you’re connecting to is next door.
Even dsl would be better honestly.
Depends on where you live. Where I am, cable is 1GB and with DSL I had 600/150.
Definitely. I have coax cable, as do most people outside of cities and get 1000/50.
Yeaaah, here in the US DSL is more like 6/1.5 at best. And no, that’s not a typo.
As much as I hate the Melon Husk it’s my only option since I don’t have a LOS for any fixed wireless service and it’s been working great so far. There is fibre coming to my area soon-ish but for gaming it’s been working great. My partner and I have been able to game online at the same time along with have a stream going and downloading ISOs.
It was, I used it, but my conscience wouldn’t allow me to give more money to a nazi when I had alternatives.
If available in your area, you should try out the 5g services. I use one and I play counter strike well and I get 200-300mbps down normally. When I got it, the first month was a trial period where you set it up and if it sucked, it was no charge. Plus sign up offee was good so look out for anything offered
Just watching users hit my servers with Starlink connections … they constantly drop and reconnect, sometimes on 5 different IP’s within a half hour. I can probably go to prometheus right now and SS a graph.
Their customers in the US are mainly people who have to ditch their local WiFi provider. You’ll get disconnects a lot.
Used a Starlink connection for a few months. Starlink is incredible… compared to the alternatives people a million miles from anything have. It can certainly be used for gaming, with <100 ping. It’s not terribly impressive by urban standards, though.
I have a coworker occasionally on starlink. The big issue with both videoconferencing and I would assume also gaming, is the handover. Each satellite is in view only for around 90 second, then the antenna hast to switch to the next. This means that your latency keeps fluctuating and you drop packets every 90 seconds during the handover. It sounds miserable.
