when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 4 months ago[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?message-squaremessage-square271linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-square[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 4 months agomessage-square271linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareHelix 🧬@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoConsent is needed if you do something with another being with feelings. Feelings aren’t needed to be able to consent. That’s simple logic, if you can’t understand that you’re incapable of discussing that argument.
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months ago Consent is needed if you do something with another being with feelings. you haven’t shown why you think this is reasonable from subjects which are incapable of consent, nor bothered to define feelings.
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months ago Feelings aren’t needed to be able to consent. so why do you keep bringing it up? it’s absurd to discuss consent from something that is incapable of consent.
Consent is needed if you do something with another being with feelings. Feelings aren’t needed to be able to consent. That’s simple logic, if you can’t understand that you’re incapable of discussing that argument.
you haven’t shown why you think this is reasonable from subjects which are incapable of consent, nor bothered to define feelings.
so why do you keep bringing it up? it’s absurd to discuss consent from something that is incapable of consent.