• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    No shit. It costs less to run than youtube which is why they run less ads

    • Addv4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, but surely they have much more limited ad revenue than YouTube, given that a lot of the ads I see on those sites are ones that pay out less (like the shitty porn ads). Personally, I suspect it’s actually competition between piracy sites that has lowered the overall ads, because you have more choices than just one in comparison to YouTube, where you can use it or leave it.

    • Lysergid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nominally? For sure. What about per user? Maybe, or maybe Youtube uses more resources than it should.

      Also we are comparing different kind of platforms. Youtube is video sharing platform. Any “creative individual” can post there 24/7 any nonsense. Piracy sites are about licensed paid content, so comparison should be against say Netflix.

      Youtube’s competitor is PeerTube which has 0 ads whatsoever

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I agree but im not drawing the comparison. The meme is drawing that comparison I am just saying why I dont think its so ridiculous for youtube to run more ads than a piracy site.

        • Lysergid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, that’s on meme, I’m not accusing you of anything.

          On ridiculousness part let me politely disagree. They don’t need so much ads, their revenue was around 25 billion in 2023. There are no official numbers on costs but guesstimations I saw around 14 billion (infra plus operational) so they could lower number of ads to 2/3 and still be very much profitable. They just won’t because people accepted it