• realitista@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I guess if you put yourself in a position to be that dependent on an idiot like Kanye, you don’t really deserve that money anyway.

    • HermitBee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Because he was headlining all 3 days. There is not a chance of getting 3 acts of similar clout to play at this short notice. At which point the event is far enough from what was advertised that they’d have to give refunds to the shitload of angry customers demanding them. Better to just cancel now.

      • AckPhttt@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Also it was speculated elsewhere that Kanye may get paid (by contract) if the festival happens, but not if the festival as a whole is canceled. It’s speculative, but reasonable to assume Kanye had strong contract guarantees.

        • samc@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Maybe they had an insurance policy for if a headliner couldn’t attend? In that case definitely easier for the organisers to just cancel and claim

        • MrNesser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Two reasons probably

          1. It’s hella expensive to cancel a headliner without cause as this would have been. it triggers all sorts of contract clauses.

          2. The guy running it was peeved at the government blocking the visa, in the long run this probably saves him money.

          Personally I’m annoyed the government has politicised something they had no right to go near.