- cross-posted to:
- uk_politics@feddit.uk
- cross-posted to:
- uk_politics@feddit.uk
It never gets better, the next one is always worse
He wouldn’t be the next in line if he did
The UK were instrumental in giving birth to this settler-colony by issuing the Balfour declaration in 1917, taking Palestine over after World War 1, arresting and executing Palestinian nationalists during the Arab uprising in 1936, and training the Irgun and Hagana Jewish terror gangs and then promptly high tailing it out of there when the going got rough. So its no surprise that British politicians are hand in glove supporting this current genocide.
Not that Balfour was well written or overly centered on justice, but Israel immediately violated what protections Balfour had.
Balfour specified that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine”.Zionists immediately launched into violating civil and religious rights in minute #1 of the Israeli states existence and theyve never stopped for a single second of that states existence. There has never been an Israel there that wasnt based on hatred, racism, and vicious oppression that massively violates civil and religious rights.
You also said the UK trained Irgun. I think you are mistaken. Irgun was primarily trained by instructors from the Polish Armed Forces in 1938 and 1939, with supplementary instruction received at the Military Engineers School in Fascist Italy. The training was facilitated through partnerships forged by Vladimir Jabotinsky’s Revisionist Zionist movement.
Irgun was attacking the Brits with terrorism attacks right before Balfour. Heres a timeline of that terrorism against the British.
https://www.palquest.org/en/overallchronology?nid=139&chronos=139
Thanks for the clarification and link. Have crossed out Irgun.
It was simply imposible to create israel without ethrnic cleansing. Belfour was just another scummy politician pretrnd yo have conditional support for an iligitimate state.
Israel is doing exactly what it was made to do, why would the USA and UK betray their own creation? Especially since it’s working.
Because supporting genocide is abhorrent?
It’s the greatest and most successful White Supremacist Nation of the present day, so of course it elicits warm fatherly feelings at least amongst the British Elites (who, by the way, before Hitler invaded Poland actually liked the NAZIs)
A second Keir, and just as genocidal
But good at talking unlike Keir
Wanted to say the same. From the frying pan into the fire. Labour will get wrecked in the next elections.
Only for the similarly Israel funded Reform to win, because while we keep fighting on whether the next candidate is anti-Israel enough, Reform manages to unite the dumbfucks of the country.
And if Brexit has proven anything it’s that the damn country has way too many dumbfucks who’ll gladly throw away everything just so a guy who blames the “right” people for the country’s troubles gets to be PM.
I’m sorry that I draw the line at genocide.
The “I’m flexible when it comes to child mass murder abroad if that stops the far-right for 4/5 more years here” crowd are something else.
That’s not having any Morals or Principles beyond “what in it for me”.
Same here, we are the worst. Basically terrorists for resisting fascism and genocide. We should be ashamed of our racism.
anywho… should we make tshirts? bbq maybe?
I agree. Labours weakness in recognizing that a more leftist oriented stance is needed will be a windfall for the Reform Nazis.
i mean, people could try voting Green, no ? fascist or fascist lite it is ffs
So why you are giving reform and easy win? Labour is to blame of reform wins
Because the alternative is to criticize Israel, and that’s so impossible for him to consider that he’d sooner hand the UK over to fascists.
So, lesser of two evils is the game? If that’s the game we’re playing, than will you be voting for Reform or Conservative? Because we can’t vote for third parties like Labour. That would be throwing your vote away. The two top parties in the UK right now are Reform and Conservative. If you believe that red lines don’t matter, and that all that matters is choosing between one of the two parties that will win, then that means your choice currently is between Reform or Conservative. Labour is a third party. Labour is not a valid choice for anyone trying to be strategic and choose the lesser of two evils.
So, will you be voting Reform or Conservative next election? Or suddenly will the lesser evil no longer apply?
The only way anyone can support Labour right now is if they reject the lesser evil approach. Of course, if you do that, then you have no place whining about the red lines other voters have.
The two top parties in the UK right now are Reform and Conservative
That’s untrue by any measure.
If reform is top by voting intention, conservatives are third or fourth. If conservatives are top by MPs, reform are sixth or seventh.
But it is true that actual Nati slogan-repeating racist, muslim-hating Nigel Farage has been polling highest, and it’s legitimate to worry about him doing in the uk and the middle east what trump is doing in America and the middle east.
I’m talking about actual poll results:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_United_Kingdom_general_election
It’s Reform as the clear favorite, with Labor and the Conservatives dueling for the third spot, and the Conservatives have been ahead most frequently in recent polls.
Also consider the accuracy of polls three years in advance of an election.
Reform’s success is a problem, but an even worse problem is reinforcing the narrative that their success is inevitable.
Very enthusiastic slaughter of civilians will do too. Hello Starmer v2.
So… It being called or not being called a genocode is the divide to where killing civilans matters? Interesting
In the US if its acknowledged to be a genocide then some existing laws take effect that mandate stopping all aid to the genociders and sanctioning them.
I’m somewhat suspicious of the way the Guardian didn’t actually publish the interview itself, but just their journalist’s writeup of it. We’re not told what the question he answered actually was, just what it was “about”, and then the headline writers of the outlets quoting that quote take it a step further into implying that he’s a full-on genocide denier.
As usual, the far right Nazi sympathisers (in this case Nigel Farage) get a free pass for “leftist” single issue voters, just like Trump did and continues to do.
The irony is that Corbyn was laid low by trumped-up accusations of anti-semitism, it would be ironic if the press did the same to AB for (supposedly) taking the opposite side.
It’s just diet genocide not the same thing.
The UN has called it genocide. I don’t even think we can joke about diet genocide anymore. I’m not really sure what other international authority on this type of stuff needs to call it genocide for people to stop tiptoeing around it.
The UN is a joke tho.
Splendid, another twat.
hey guys, this labour leader is not better. Let’s allow “Reform” to win so that they can do the same thing AND purge britain of all the brown people and gay people.
Maybe you can get your straw man to vote for labour!
There’s always Green. We need a serious campaign to promote the only popular party that’s offering anything different.
Yeah, because those are the only possible choices. /s
Tells me everything I needed to know about him
Britain: the more things are made to look like they’re changing, the more they stay the same.
I know, right? I voted green anyway, but I’m really disappointed in Labour. Fuckin spineless centrist capitalist cunts.
Another fucking coward.
Kind of oddly worded. Sounds like he doesn’t want to comment on it because he’s not PM yet.
He is in the labour friend of israel organization
RIP broEdit: do you have any evidence of this? Can’t see him listed in any of the publicly available member lists.
wikipedia offers only an indirect relation
In 2010, Jennifer Gerber, previously director of Progress and before that, special advisor to Andy Burnham, was appointed director.















