• Aniki@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    yeah i just realized, this isn’t even accurate. we can’t leech off another’s metabolism. there’s no one out there (within reach) .

      • Aniki@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        actually, what if viruses (free-swimming RNA) were the original form of life and proteins only developed later? then viruses would be the simplest possible organisms.

        • TheGoldenGod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          That idea resembles the RNA world hypothesis, which proposes that early life may have consisted of self-replicating RNA molecules before DNA and proteins became dominant. RNA is remarkable because it can both store genetic information and catalyze some chemical reactions.

          The difficulty is with calling viruses the original life…

          Modern viruses are not just “free-swimming RNA.” They depend completely on living cells to reproduce. Even the simplest RNA viruses require a host cell’s ribosomes, enzymes, energy, and raw materials. Outside a cell, a virus is essentially inert. That makes it hard to imagine viruses existing before cells did.

          • Aniki@feddit.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            yeah i know about the RNA world hypothesis.

            by the way, has anyone ever built an artificial organism that only uses RNA with no proteins that is actually able to live (reproduce) in an inorganic environment?