As opposed to “spirit of the law.” I’d imagine they’d have a comparatively hard time passing a law literally revoking citizenship for nonwhite Americans.
But passing a law that retroactively revokes citizenship based on birthright and then “accidentally” only applying it to nonwhites might work. So they’d need to be vague enough in the phrasing.

No no, disengage entirely. Let chat bots do everything for you. Don’t do research, don’t try to understand, just copy and paste. Best put your brain in a jar and set it on the nightstand. /s obviously.

Aren’t the US usually more of a “letter of the law” type of legislation?

If they’d cancelled it, would that be retroactiv? Revoking the citizenship of every US American not of native heritage would be one hell of a move.

Much to Putin’s joy.

Not only, but maybe mostly.

[…] If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.

— Sun Tzu

Supercritical, not superconducting.

sometimes they just make shit up.

Kinda disqualifies it as a “search engine” in my book.

/s

As you may have noticed, it’s not 2032, so NASA was right.

So you can eat anything in the dark.

Didn’t Macron just praise Spain for denying them the same thing?