• 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle

  • First of all, I’m going to say that I don’t think this comparison actually makes sense and I was just entertaining the question of the message I was replying to - humans are machines are way too different to reduce the comparison to merely “which is more energy efficient”.

    But second, I compared to the same level - I stopped at infrastructure. I didn’t consider the costs (energy or otherwise) of building a solar panel or power plants in the same way I didn’t consider the costs of a frying pan, a hob, or farms. Because if we do that, then any point we make about this needs to be a 500 page dissertation, not a Lemmy message.

    The good news is that data for how much material/energy is required for a solar panel is freely available, and also that a solar panel can be used for energy generation many more times than a cow.


  • Well, in pure energy usage, no; however if you take into account the energy usage of the whole chain, they’re orders of magnitude better.

    After all, they can even be hooked up to a solar panel directly. For us to get 2000 kJ of energy, we need to water plants for a year, transport them, spend more than 2000 kJ of electricity cooking, and that’s not even considering raising an animal for x months or years which needs >5000 kJ a day to just exist. Our sun->movement energy efficiency rate is pretty appalling and orders of magnitude worse than a robot’s - even if the robot is just hooked onto the regular grid.





  • Jrockwar@feddit.uktoUnited Kingdom@feddit.ukWoke Reicht
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Of course not; in the eyes of Tories, all Muslims have brown skin, which is BAD. But Jews are white, so that’s “good”.

    I cannot comprehend how Kemi Badenoch can be okay with racist policies. It’s like gay Republicans in the US, I guess… Crazy cognitive dissonance.

    Surely the leopards wouldn’t eat my face…


  • It used to be really hard to defend Apple and the pricing of their “budget” lines. But these days it seems manufacturers are trying HARD to make apple look like the sensible option.

    £1099 for a 2 year old processor, 1080p, 256GB and 16GB RAM, and it doesn’t even run linux but windows? How’s that better than a £1099 Macbook Air that comes with a better screen, brand new processor, 512GB and the same 16GB of RAM?

    At this point you’re paying extra for the privilege of dealing with Windows and Copilot. 🙄


  • At the risk of being called a corporate bootlicker, it sounds like it isn’t their own, it was their employer’s.

    If it’s your own, absolutely, fair play. If it’s your employer’s… Then it feels murkier. I wouldn’t blame their IT department for being quite cross if/when time comes to upgrade and return the laptop and give it a second life. For example, I would be quite pissed if IT gave me a defaced laptop like this as a loaner while mine is getting repaired.