These people need the definition of “obscenity” beaten into them. Roughly it’s “something that any reasonable person would object to existing at all”

10 years ago there’d be no doubt courts would strike it down if such a law was passed.

Big tech is at a scale where it’s cheap to do an in-house solution. Amazon maintains its own distribution for internal Amazon systems

Every organization uses Windows because they can’t fathom that Ubuntu is perfectly fine to use.

Will this win or loose him the election

NASA

“Man breathing arrested for murder”

They really seem to be a live service - the game refuses to work unless its on the latest version

Yeah I know what the study actually meant - it changes the decision making process (physiologically)

Wow really??? Influences on decision making may alter how the brain makes decisions!!!1!1!1?1? This is so interesting and unheard of.

It provides identical amounts of ownership to pirating it. Legally it’s a license same as Steam.

This is MUCH better than requiring a second device to do anything

It’s been 2 years and we still recognize [the name] Twitter better than X

The antisocial behaviour

Because coordinating something with hundreds of people is “antisocial”

Ohh wait I get it. “A liter [bottle] shrank to…”

1 liter != 0.9 liter

Nope! They say they arrest more people for thing instead of China’s “national security” thing.

probably thinks

No he doesn’t

Is the “low” 37% instead of 38%?

The metric version makes no sense