

There’s very good reasons for the birthright citizenship dating from post-slavery. However, most countries don’t do birthright citizenship. They do have a statute that allows for citizenship if you were born there and lived there for a certain period of time though - which would/could arguably be a more sensible approach overall as long as the removal of birthright citizenship isn’t being done for bigotry reasons, which, unfortunately, the US has proved time and time again that is the main reason it exists in the first place and why it shouldn’t be removed. Once it eventually grows up past its racial-predjudice stage, it might be able to rectify this.










Hmm, didn’t think I was being aggressive or arguing in bad faith as I wasn’t arguing at all. I was agreeing, and just find it odd that there’s a need for the propaganda and pandering. It’s not something that should need to happen and doesn’t happen elsewhere, and is ridiculed when it does. I find it somewhat fascinating that a country like the US has to spend time self-propagandising to its citizens rather than letting its actions do the talking for it.
Who am I talking to? Anyone who finds that juxtaposition interesting too.
Ultimately, this is a science community. I admitted that I pondering politics and psychology which wasn’t the main topic of the thread so I said I was stopping. But if you decide to read it in another way, I won’t stop you.
Edit: there’s only 14 comments in this thread, and 1 or 2 mentioned propaganda so no, not everyone has mentioned it. Maybe many don’t see it like that being that it’s just normality to them (like those who don’t think reciting the pledge of allegiance daily is strange)