Ok, so, regarding these ideas:

• “it has not been revealed enough how damaging sugar is” – I would agree with this. I’m not sure that was his intention in particular.
• Ancel (intentionally?) overlooked some data when forming his theory – I would agree with this too. But it doesn’t make the harm of cholesterol moot. Or do you now want to ignore the other data yourself? It just makes the situation more complex than simply “fat alone is bad”. Too much fat is still bad.

He made a step, perhaps a bit too long in a mistaken direction, but understanding didn’t and won’t stop with him. How everyone reacted to his theory was also part of the fault.

And you think this guy invented heart disease, then?

A dietitian who “established the link between cholesterol and heart disease, created K rations for the US military” and died in 2004 aged 100 is the world’s greatest villain for you?..

Visualize a clever joke. Then realize this is nothing like that and you will reach enlightenment.

Try instead visualizing a racist quip that someone that voted for Trump might enjoy.

“Retribution” is a common false friend ( faux ami) in English-Spanish translation, where English speakers might mistakenly use retribución to mean punishment, whereas retribución actually means compensation, payment, or remuneration.

And Spanish is not the only language where “retribution” means remuneration. English is the weird one here.

Removed by god

Removed by admin

He’s circling the drain.

Oof, I hope everything turns out great for you! (And since I just now noticed your username: thank you for everything you’ve been doing for us!)

Happy… bleedivus, I guess!

But seriously, I don’t think the AI was very wrong here, depending on how severe the bleeding was? Did the doctors say anything?

Oh god, the AIs are now training people…

Flicks light switch off.