According to you. While you’re welcome to your opinion on it, I do not have to agree. Especially when you have no evidence to support your assertion that we must only respond in X fashion to Y event or risk diluting the “true argument”.
I counter with: only serious and doomer talk risks alienating and wearing down the people you need to help out.
Sure, which issue were you wanting to talk about that you instead felt the need to lambast me for some humor?
Actually scratch that. You’re free to go talk about serious issues at hand while I make a joke. Believe it or not, we can do multiple things at once considering we are more than one person.
I think you mean soft on crime, hard-on for couches
Also ask how many flat earthers there are at NASA. We must cater to the close minded to prove our point of diversity!
What profits? As far as I know, most or all AI are still massively unprofitable…
We do this with crawfish in a lot of parts of the world, and that works a lot better since they’ll also eat the decomposing plant matter that falls off the rice to keep the water cleaner and plants healthier.
Nah, we get Noah Wyle in new Librarian movies
We only need a portion of them, and a lot of the easiest ones to get enjoy crass jokes and already don’t like JD so… Cater to the audience