Cool Joe. This person spoke with unchecked righteous indignation and just a booming unearned confidence - all while they are vacant when it cones to the nuance of the discussed situation. In that scenario, my goal isn’t a respectful exchange of ideas with a peer, it’s something to maybe knock them off the unchecked BS they are likely spewing left and right in real life and online. As represented by their expressed opinion here at least, this person is the third person in the sinking boat in that well circulated cartoon - and that person sucks.

We’re all frustrated with the lack of action in places before and presently, that said there’s a reality that informs how and why a lot was done (or not done) and if a person doesn’t care enough to educate themselves of that enough to inform their online vitriol, then they aren’t expressing a mature POV - they instead express something more similar to a child’s approach to a complex problem before their brain has fully formed. So I’ll likely continue on, but appreciate the conversation.

Do timelines, projected with appeals and delays, mean this will get to SCOTUS right before the election?

Melanie has wanted a lot of terrible things - most relevant to the burning world surrounding you and I, she wanted to marry trump and grow another of his mouth breathing society cancers.

Last admin didn’t do enough AND you have a child’s point of view of the nuance of that actual situation and the board of governors. Also, as others have pointed out, DeJoy is gone, but only to go back to privately grifting. Further, last admin was the most progressive of my lifetime, but it still wasn’t enough. You seem to gauge success based on your gut and guess what your gut is full of, friend?

Try not to speak with righteous, blustering confidence while your head is all the way up your ass… The words get muffled and it’s hard to hear you embarrassing yourself.

You’re bringing a lot of personal momentum to your responses obviously. My point was clear, state specific issues to allow the potential for specific answers. If you’re moving in good faith, that’s the approach.

The perspective here is one of someone resistant to change, blaming FOSS as an easier scapegoat. Always simplest to blame the tool over the operator… And often, that “dumbshit, broken printer that won’t print!!!” Just wasnt plugged in.

Your rebuttal is borked.

I appreciate you attempting expansion, I will say it is still difficult when you’re asked for specific detail and your response consistently States generalities like:

“lack of support” - meaning what, feature isn’t there at all? Doesn’t display existing tables from uploaded excel docs?

“has serious issues” - meaning… what are they?

“results in issues” - …

“…is borked” - c’mon

and "incredibly slow " - relative to what? Double time of expected from excel? Triple? Extra two seconds per attempt?

You’re using subjective terms that mean people can’t A) determine if you’re problem will impact them as well and B) you’re not describing your perceived issues well enough to allow experts reading along here, now or in the future, to offer you actual solutions or alternatives.

That considered, it makes you come off as a person who doesn’t want their perceived problem solved.

Probably more credibility if you actually give real, specific examples of what you cannot do on Libre Calc that you require?