

Not providing an age signal is not illegal, you just won’t be able to access restricted material like social media.


Not providing an age signal is not illegal, you just won’t be able to access restricted material like social media.


Debian uses systemd, so its coming whatever they decide.


Debian can’t survive without California.


Yes because that’s how governments work.


No that’s total garbage.
The law doesn’t mention commerciality or vendors, only operating systems.


Only restricted material will require an age verification.


The legislation is clear and unambiguous : an operating system must provide an age verification which is able to accessible by third parties on the internet.
From a non-lawyer perspective, it is not yet clear how such regulations apply to a non-commercial, volunteer-driven project like Debian, which does not sell software and provides it in a highly decentralized way
There’s no mention of selling in the law.


All the conservative members of the Supreme Court are RC.


There is no “start” it has been an absolute failure.


It wasn’t designed to address online problems, it’s purpose was to placate the mainstream media.


They put it in a bag and use a syringe to inject brine. Its not “literally injected”.


They feed chickens (and other animals) with that stuff that muscle builders use which causes them to get thirsty and distends the muscle cells just before slaughter.


Because that’s literally how you make bacon…


If they don’t implement they won’t be able to access any site with restricted material.
No major website will willingly exclude California.


Ghostbusters on the C64, it sucked.
Manic Miner, a ruined rip-off of Miner 2049er.


That’s not what they asked
Wrong. That is all that is asked in the Californian legislation.


No one has manuals anymore.
Its not very much, Chrysler had over a million vehicles in stock 18 months ago.