- 3 Posts
- 12 Comments
Ok, that’s it. You have officially crossed the line from a zealot spewing increasingly false equivalences to saying that everyone who doesn’t agree with you is equivalent to slave owners and fascists.
I’m done indulging your self-righteous hallucinations. Have the day you deserve.
PS: No, I’m not from the US or southern Europe. I chose the abortion example because of complete topical symmetry, not because it’s a hot topic here in Denmark. It hasn’t been since the 1970s.
Do you believe that racism or sexism is wrong?
You’re acting EXACTLY like an anti choice person asking me if I think murder is wrong because I believe in a woman’s right to choose 🤦
Do you think a racist or sexist person would share your belief?
Not necessarily and not necessarily not, since they’re in no way related.
Are you not, then, applying your subjective beliefs that they don’t share to their actions?
No. Their veganism is actively selected by them based on their subjective beliefs about animals being basically human.
My lack of veganism is not based in ideology.
I don’t eat grains based on the belief that insects are worth less than other animals. I eat grains to be sated, for their nutritional value, and for their taste.
Exactly the same reason why I sometimes eat meat.
Their argument is sound; it is just based on different axioms than yours.
No. Their argument is based on applying their subjective beliefs that I don’t share to my actions and as such by definition not sound.
It’s a 1:1 equivalent of anti choice people calling abortion murder.
“Those are not at all equivalent” IS a refutation.
It’s not my job to spoonfeed bigots about exactly how my dietary (lack of) choices is different from hating trans and black people while sponsoring fascism 🙄
Nope. They’re objectively spewing a large array of false equivalence and my personal comment was directly and logically derived from that and that only.
It was thus logically sound AKA not a fallacy.
Your comment, on the other hand, is a textbook example of a reverse causation fallacy strawman combo:
you portray my criticism of their argument as a personal criticism when in fact my subsequent personal criticism is based on the illogic of their argument and nothing else.
Holy false equivalences, Batman! Are you going for the record or are you really THAT bad at discerning wildly disparate concepts and levels of severity from each other? 🤦
Just like how evangelical vegans actively assert what they think is their right to control the diets and other lifestyle choices of adult humans who haven’t asked them to? 🙄
Omnivore, maybe? 🤷
But yeah, pretending that eating meat is an ism IS an insult when coming from an evangelical vegan who considers it morally reprehensible lol
Me every time a militant vegan says “carnist”:

Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldto
Work Reform@lemmy.world•US supreme court sides with Starbucks in union case over fired employees
0·2 years agoAnd I had been on such a good run of nobody saying shit relevant to this comic…😮💨

I don’t care if you’re watching it in 32k on Odin’s personal account, white on yellow is NEVER acceptable for ANYTHING.




I said have the day you deserve. I’m done with your Dunning Kruger poster boy nonsense.