not “if” but “when” but that is of no concern to CxO’s and “market analysts” 😉

Top-notch disinformation thread. Nobody is interested in actual history, genocides presented as liberation etc. Putting Stalin face on it makes it all only worse. Man responsible for millions of his own people deaths, whose policies and attitudes were on-par with Nazis and who was losing battle after battle until West started to supply cheap Armament’s en-masse which were augumented with USSR raw human resourses, sent through meat-grinder attacks and wrecking devastation on par with Nazis as they “liberated” Europe. The only difference was that they were’n solely fixated on Jews. Listen kids, Communism as a theory is OK, using horrible practical implementations of that theory is not OK. Forgetting history lessons only leads to same mistakes over and over. Don’t idolize murderers and tirants. Use all the knowledge you have access to today and build better future than any of those individuals mustered.

This is irrelevant as CEO’s and shareholders keep screaming “moar AI!”. Engineers know limits of the tool but are forced to ignore those. So yes,LLM is comming for your job but not because it can do it,but because it is perceived to be cheaper.

yes

it actually will take your job… it will crash industries and economies a touch later, when all the knowledge and expertise is lost and we’re left with a choice of rolling back a century or keep living within enshitified society. And not because AI is useless, but because suits and wallstreet are casing exponential profits from the snake oil AI outfits are selling.

there was labour movement that clawed some freedoms and dignity from savage capitalism. Those gains are eroding fast now. Unchecked, capitalism has no inventive for sharing spoils with labour.

is that the same guy claiming that there should be no moderation on Facebook for “true freedom” and who cried his eyes out telling stories of horrible Democracts making him take out deranged individuals off platform? Well…

not just US problem though

VERY dramatic. Maybe even accurate. But does it really matter? System needs to change. Otherwise same people will hijack Dems and you’ll have NOTHING to tramp it with having a single party. So yeah, nuance, grasshopper.

there’s a name for it: “racheting”

that kind of verbiage only promotes political division and confrontation. So being precise with what you say does matter. Should dissenting opinions exist? Should there be guardrails AGAINST blatant breaks of law (domestic and international)? Should people be jailed or exterminated for their political views? Who has monopoly on violence? etc. etc. Political demise for republicans would be nice but then take into consideration how very close Mainstream Democrats are to republicans. This is not solved by political extermination of Republicans but by pluralistic government, proportional representation that allows for more nuance and forces compromise… would still need strong and independent judicial branch to hold government to account. Calls for extermination of “other” was always a prerogative of radical extremes, ability to set the framework that prevents any abuse and having a dialogue is what defines “civilized” society

Mulcair advises ring shallow as we saw NDP contract under him and not thrive at all. I’d love to hear Jack Layton on the subject but alas…