I guess the sentiment is everyday individuals and not the corporates and the wealthy. Financial benefits of advancements rarely seem to benefit common folks

Man, this is heavy to read, especially with International Labour Day around the corner. We talk so much about productivity, growth, and prosperity but the reality is that labour has been squeezed harder and harder while the benefits of that prosperity keep flowing upward.

Who is seriously championing a four day work week? Who is pushing for fairer wealth distribution? Who is fighting for regulations that actually protect workers from burnout, insecurity, harassment and endless stress?

At some point, we have to admit that these are not just personal health issues. They are structural issues. Work should not be costing people their health, their families, their peace, and in too many cases, their lives. I hate this.

Ned used to ruffs and boofs and play, now three small fluffs have claimed his day, he dares not move, he stays instead, a very warm and furry bed. Thank you Ned!

“Alexander” was an incredibly common name in the Greek world. Even within his own family tree, he was technically Alexander III of Macedon. Using “The Great” was a practical necessity for historians to distinguish him from his father’s predecessors and the dozens of other Alexanders running around the Mediterranean. Plus his scale of impact was absurd! Charlemagne literally means “Charles the Great” because there were many Charleses. Finally, while we usually think of Julius Caesar, “Caesar” became a title used by every Roman Emperor for centuries. It eventually evolved into “Kaiser” and “Tsar”. If you just say “Caesar” in a room full of Roman history buffs they actually will ask you to disambiguate which one you mean

James, can we circle back on the business objective here?

For me, it’s a watch with a built in flashlight. Way more useful than I expected