Easy. They are not mutually exclusive?

How many TP Link routers, were found to be compromised by China and had to be removed from U.S. infrastructure?

Salt Typhoon hack?

Why does China restrict access to the internet without massive censure?

Your link just takes me back to your parent comment.

Your entire argument is the pot calling the kettle black.

If you were just discussing the shitty things the U.S. is doing, I would be in total agreement, but you are trying to shoehorn “How great China is” into the discussion.

No matter how terrible the U.S. is and gets, it will not erase all the terrible things China has and is doing too. No matter how much you argue otherwise.

No one is giving the U.S. a pass. This is a deliberate mischaracterization.

Until this regime, the U.S. had some of the best solar subsidies on the planet.

The U.S., as a surveillance state, is still in its infancy when compared to China. So it is laughable that you are using China in any comparison to the U.S., in almost the same breath.

“Carceral State” is a tanky propagandist dog whistle.

Why don’t you debate faults on their own? Because you are deliberately trying to use current bad conduct, of the U.S. to whitewash another country’s bad conduct.

“Oh hey, the U.S. is super shitty, but we have made so much solar in the past year so we’re all about global stability.”

Ignore EVERYTHING China has done though, only look at the bad that the U.S. is doing.

I’m sure you have plenty of arguments that support or claim how China has been with: Taiwan

Uygher people

Support of North Korea

Support of Russia against Ukraine

Tibet

The horde of nonsense “technological breakthroughs” that seem to come every month but never amount to anything and just disappear.

The pollution that has been produced by Chinese industry that pretends to adhere to global standards but get busted when college students use basic satellite data.

Suppression of Hong Kong

China’s state sponsored industrial espionage.

China’s disregard of human rights abroad when kidnapping Chinese dissidents from foreign countries.

(This is just me pulling the random items I can just immediately recall)?

But that is all Western propaganda I’m sure. Feel free to break out your playbook responses.

I didn’t use bad language this time for you to get my comment deleted, since suppression is one of your biggest tools.

This guy would probably argue that the protest at Tiannamon Square was a CIA funded false flag operation. If he was allowed to even discuss it in a way that implied it really happened.

Don’t waste your time talking to tankies

At least this one gives it away with his name. Usually their simping for China gives them away.

They only accept their little cesspit of information as facts. Everything else is conspiracy theories or state funded propaganda.

Go back to whatever tanky community you came from. You know, the ones that ban anyone that has a differing opinion and screws up your circlejerk echo chamber. Tell Cowbee I said hello.

Yeah, the U.S. is shit, but don’t start trying to evangelize some sort of revisionist bullshit about China.

I’ll stack up the U.S.'s bullshit against China any day of the fucking week. The U.S. has a HUGE fucking pile of it, but the U.S. won’t even come close to the monstrosities that China has committed.

That doesn’t excuse any of the U.S.'s bullshit, but it also doesn’t mean you get to play fast and loose with the facts, to try and pull on over on people who might not know any real history.

There’s so much misinformation out there, and that is one of the reason’s the U.S. is a steaming pile of orangutan shit right now, so I get particularly annoyed when I see posts like yours

Do us a favor and go fuck your own face, you propagandist jackass.

I think we’ve stopped at the “wrong things” part and just refuse to move on.

Motherlover or Dick in a Box could both work here.

I mean isn’t this post kind of giving consent?

I’m afraid if I offer suggestions I’ll start getting knocks on my door at 2am.

Came here to say this.

Pretty sure most of the time the password is expired or invalidated, as you said, but whoever vibe coded the system was too lazy, too dumb, or too terrified of being blamed for the frustration of changing a password, that they think it is better to put ALL the frustration on the user.

Whatever the reason, I fucking hate them.

So my experience accounts for nothing?

So even though I’ve lost access to multiple titles because other software companies can’t get their shit together and were a terrible experience, I’m not allowed to use that as an example of why Valve has become the standard?

But any argument against your opinion is “simping”.

Do you even hear yourself?

What you are doing is a form of manipulation and gaslighting.

Those things Valve was sued over were also industry standard practices.

Your argument is awash with emotional outbursts which tells the real story here.

You’ve picked a side for one reason or another and just make bad arguments, trying to support it.

Show me a single game company, of that size, that HASN’T been sued. Since that seems to be your metric of what makes a company so evil.

Same as how they passed prohibition.

It’s actually quite fascinating even as it is disconcerting.

They lobbied state by state, and focused on a few key legislators, threatening their seat, until the rest fell in line.

They didn’t have to fight them all at once, so they could focus their resources.

This is a very narrow viewpoint that is borderline disingenuous.

You blame OP for being a simp, BECAUSE OF A MEME, then argue the plaintiff’s narrative without any critical breakdown or context.

You are not any better.

There is a lot of nuance here that you just ignore.

Valve is not using their resources to prevent/undermine competition.

Valve’s percentage is absolutely worthy of debate, but does not make them a monopoly.

I will state that I support Valve when it comes to the big releases, but definitely wish they tiered their fees to support smaller developers.

I get why they do it, but I wish they were a bit friendlier to the smaller developers

If the other companies used a platform that was even remotely close to the ease of use as Steam, I might feel differently, but they don’t

I have lost access to several titles because of these companies’ “competing” platforms.

Valve provides a service that is critical and beneficial. And in a way that these other companies seem incapable or unwilling to provide.

They are not preventing them from doing it in any way.

They just don’t want to get undercut on products that use their service. That is a valid argument.

Maybe if other companies didn’t create such bloated, underperforming crapware, they wouldn’t feel forced to use Steam.

And smaller developers aside, these companies already suck so much money out of the user/buyer as they can and are not passing that revenue to the actual software developer, while Valve does share its revenue with its employees, despite your claim that Gabe is buying his “27th yacht”.

I have a forerunner 255 for a couple of years and it has been great.

I wish they had wireless charging, but I also appreciate that it is slimmer because they don’t have it.

I would have gotten a nicer one, but holy cow they get expensive.

It does everything I need and even stores music for my runs. (Who am I lying to, it stores music for my walks.)

I have a Garmin BP cuff and I like that I can track my health stats, including sleeping