[deleted]

They accelerate towards each other

EU CAT tax.

Babelfish!

So many tiny Pharaohs!

Guess we just let for profit companies and authoritarian states suck up all the data on everyone whether it works or not then.

Limiting total time spent on something is one of the parental control options. It isn’t just blocking things 100%.

Limiting total time spent on something is one of the parental control options. It isn’t just blocking things 100%.

There is no problem to solve that hasn’t already been addressed with parental controls.

Death Knight tank, but otherwise accurate.

For less than 12 months, sure.

Who needs external malicious actors when you jam AI into your workflow?

Never, because when the appropriate amount of money is used they don’t call it ‘throwing money at the problem’. It is a phrase that means something along the same lines as wasting money on a thing instead of doing what is really needed.

Thanos was wrong in theory.

Halving all life doesn’t change the life to resources ratio. Even halving all sapient life doesn’t solve anything when populations will just continue to grow.

I quoted the amendment, which I am all in favor of. In fact, I am in favor of well regulated ownership by anyone who can pass a gun safety course. While I am in favor of background checks to reduce the chances of someone buying a gun when they are not eligible due to a violent felony or similar reasons (part of that well regulated thing), I am against tracking those background checks or a gun registry.

My dislike of stupid court rulings that contradict the amendment is based on what is written and putting it on individuals who want to play rambo doesn’t mean I don’t like the basic concept.

Also shitty social media that takes down content for bullshit reasons leading to people self censoring to avoid having their stuff taken down.

They don’t have to rule in his favor 100% of the time to be on his side.

“What was really meant was…” is how they turned the second amendment, clearly about forming a militia for national defense, into being about personal self defense.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The first half I made bold is what the second half is based on. It is about having an armed society so it can be a well regulated militia. Now those same words just mean people get to have guns for whatever reason they want and not because they are part of a militia.

In this case, they are pretending that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means something completely fictional based on what they want it to mean blatantly contradicting over a century of clear reinforcement of what it literally means.

I also like the narratives of continuous game support, easy updates, being able to install games any number of times forever, making a fantastic handheld gaming device that can be hooked up to a TV that is easy to update and modify, convenient ways to communicate and play with friends, reviews, and basically everything except for the forums (which should be moderated by the game publishers).

The only complaints I recall people making about steam are losing their account because they forgot their password and valve being thorough in not just giving it to someone or that easy streaming killed physical games. To be honest, the first sucks but isn’t valve’s fault and the second is just convenience and reliability being more attractive than physical media. I have played and have had continuous access to far more games since steam than prior because I don’t have to manage physical media and the benefits outweigh the negatives of not really owning the games. Everything is a tradeoff, and I chose to get rid of old consoles because they were too much work compared to using online games services like steam.

I also did use several of the other ones in the meme and dropped them because they offered only downloading games and weren’t even very good at that.

Seems like the purse is going to have an ever escalating competition for being big enough to grab.

Putin controls a large number of strings and buttons.