the KIDS act may or may not pass the US senate, the EU is planning a social media ban, chat control might pass, etc… what exactly do i have to do to prep for all this?

  • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Meshtastic nodes.

    Tell all your friends that the money the made off your data was used for rich people to buy your government.

    I’ve finally talked a few people into not allowing stores to scan their IDs for cigarettes and booze. They will just sell the info to insurance companies and use it to charge you more or deny your insurance at all.

    NextDNS

    Write local government to have flock cameras removed.

  • Twanquility@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Free yourself from digital “bigtech” dependence which might be affected. Make peace with inconvienience.

    Right? Not very concrete though. Anything else?

    • IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s inevitable that complete dominance is coming. It’s clear. Eventually one will either have to use their bullshit or they won’t be able to exist in “modern” society.

      People need to realize the name of the game being played is conquest, it’s not for the good of humanity, it’s for ownership. “We” conquested animals, natives, etc… authentic genuine humans are next. Authentic humanity needs to stop denying that humanity itself, as a whole is part of the game. We aren’t special. Humanity will be conquested and you will either be in or out. And the divide will be like the difference of upperclass Manhattan and skid row. …Or worse… maybe a concentration camp.

      And we are still funding that dream today like fools.

  • SirSmoothAES@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    If you’re asking how to mitigate the damage use a VPN to bypass restrictions. If you actually want to prevent the legislation from passing you will have to organize offline.

  • Linux and degoogle your phone.

    Put tailsOS onto a thumbdrive as a backup encase of VPN blockage.

    Is your Lemmy instance in a country likely to use age verification?

    Get away from big social media. Read about how the kids in Australia are staying on social media after the ban.

    • Tixo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Do we have the new Lara protocol already with voice and all? I forgot about those things, been waiting for that to hop in.

        • Tixo@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yes I know, but on the new version it was said to be done better, faster, higher quality and much easier.

          • non_burglar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Lora has like 12k max bandwidth, much less in real environments. Voice works in asymmetric transmission (like walkie talkies), but it’s not useful in any meaningful way over unlicensed airwaves.

            • Tixo@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              I read somewhere that the new version was supposed to improve that and make it viable for talking. I might be wrong though.

  • All Ice In Chains@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Get a tor browser lined up. You likely already have a VPN or won’t get one anytime soon, but tor is free. Three letter agencies have bought poisoned nodes but probably not enough of them, so this will give you a temp way around surveillance and VPN bans. Might be better if you set your entry nodes outside of 14 eyes countries.

  • minty@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    If you haven’t already, chuck linux onto some laptop/pc. In the future we may have OS level age verification needed and linux should be more immune

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Unless your prep includes “fight against it politically, tooth and nail,” you’re only delaying the inevitable.

    There is no such thing as a technological solution to what is fundamentally a political problem. Ultimately, the fascists pushing this shit have to be destroyed or they will destroy us.

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Lol no.

      The politics can’t control the tech. We just route around their laws. The internet is global and outside their justification

      • scolopendra@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        The internet is global and outside their justification

        But it isn’t. The internet is a bunch of interconnected computers right, the infrastructure that connects them can very well be victim of political maneuvers. The beginning of the internet as we know it had to do with politics, and it was funded in part through politics. That’s not gonna stop just know that it took off.

        And politics can absolutely control the tech, like for the bans on selling GPUs to China.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        You need to learn the difference between a workaround and a solution.

        Also, don’t try to pretend that a normal person is going to live as an outlaw just so they can avoid enshittification. Most people will comply, and society as a whole – which includes you, even if you don’t comply yourself! – will suffer for it.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I2P

    I2P!

    I2PPPPPPPPP!!!

    We can build another internet here, if we want to.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I2P

    Imagine p2p torrents, but crazy encrypted, and you build an internet out of that. That’s basically I2P.

    Everyone is a dns/routing server for everyone else, and no one actually knows whose traffic is going where.

    If you stay inside of I2P, its basically impossible to be de anonymized, unlike with TOR, where a government LE or Intel agency can just operate nodes and de anonymize people.

    • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I wish someone would figure out how to combine Hyphanet (original Freenet) and I2P. Basically the network based storage rather than having to have each services server online all the time to work.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Hah uh yeah, sure!

            Though, As I’ve said elsewhere… in terms of actual implementation of this, I’m really a novice at best, maybe up to ‘intermediate’ at a few things.

            From the rest of this thread, it seems kyliann0087 is more well versed in this, has their own bit of an ongoing service set up in i2p land…

            I am happy to try to help, but you might ask them what you’ve just asked of me, I suspect if they agreed, they’d be more useful than I would be.

            I’m uh… more of an I2P fanboy/evangelist, lol.


            EDIT

            ok here are some of the resources i mentioned earlier/elswhere in the thread, but was too lazy to link earlier:

            Mental Outlaw:

            Intro to I2P (5 yo youtube video)

            Make Linux Ungovernable with I2P (much more recent youtube video)

            How I run Darknets From My Home Internet (5 yo odysee video, because some of this content/info is apparently too spicy for YouTube)

            An ‘Awesome-I2P’ list, basically a curated list of many different I2P projects/software:

            https://github.com/mikalv/awesome-i2p

            • strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              Lol no problem! I’m a fangirl/evangelist for Linux, and I’m only intermediate at it.

              Thanks for the resouces; I love awesome-* lists! Also the videos look rather interesting (I see that Linux-Libre penguin…)

              I’ll get started today, methinks. It’s my day off :3

              • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                I think MO sells his own merch shirts, with linux inspired/related designs.

                Like the penguin with showering equipment… that he almost certainly designed to be worn to conventions, with linux people, to politely remind them to bathe, lol.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I mean, no 100% guarantees here, but I don’t know how they would block it…

        I guess they could just block an entire massive port range or something, but I think that would break a good chunk of the internet.

        I think the more realistic fear in this case would be your own at home router or pc itself having backdoors and rootkits you don’t know about, that then ‘phone home’, or perhaps store some kind of local log you don’t know exists, that they grab physically.

        Yeah I think they’d have to basically say ‘its illegal to use anything other than a US gov approved router and browser and OS, brought to you by megagcorp,’ full on cyberpunk fascist overdrive.

        Now would even that totally block it? Technically, no, effectively, probably?

        Honestly, do you own research on this… I’m not an expert, I could be wrong, but my understanding of it so far is that… yeah, it would take ‘unthinkable’ measures to effectively block this.

    • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yes! I totally agree. I do host a public yacy instance over I2P already (search engine)

      I have been experimenting with Lemmy and stoat over I2P. I did get them working but it is still a big Hassel. Also for anyone wanting to try hosting stoat. You can’t use i2pd because it doesnt implement full socks which breaks some of the http headers you need with stoat.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        If you can actually figure out some more shit there, document it, that would be extremely useful information, imo.

        Theoretically, at least a modified version of lemmy should be constructible within I2P land… but trying to make it accessible via clearnet would… almost certainly be basically not worth it, and arguably defeat the entire point?

        It is possible to use I2P as effectively an extremely complex VPN sort of thing for clearnet, via outproxies, but you then just have to trust the outproxy, basically.

        • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I would not make it accessible on the clearnet. Kinda defaults the purpose. I rather have things be usable like normal but over I2P.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I won’t lie, setting it up and configuring it and actually using it is basically confusing as fuck… I’ve been doing this kind of shit for decades, and this is fucking complicated to me.

        So… yeah. If more people could use this, maybe we could actually get something approximating a user friendly set up/usage guide or setup script type thing.

        I think MentalOutlaw has a video or two explaining it, but… those would be several years old by now, may be out of date.

    • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      This is great for now but still uses the same hardware and infrastructure as the “regular” internet and is therefore susceptible to government control. Granted, they’d have to cut way deeper than just age verification laws.

      If you stay inside of I2P, its basically impossible to be de anonymized

      Unless there is another zero day, like in 2014.
      https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2014/07/29/i2p-patched-against-de-anonymizing-0-day-tails-integration-still-to-follow/

  • stripes@lemmy.rhys.sh
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Take it on a spectrum. You can either do nothing and accept it, damage mitigate, reject, reject while accepting the friction it entails, or just completely drop off from many services entirely. I lean toward the latter end of it.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    You don’t have to use big tech chat apps, or social media. Or even any site with “age verification” (real id).

    Just stop using it. I have no idea why people think they have to use these things.

    • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s a naïve stance. OP is even talking about the process of it worsening. That means, what happens when sites that don’t implement age verification aren’t reachable anymore? Be that because they have simply been outlawed, because VPNs have become unfeasible or even because states will implement a firewall similiar to China? “Just don’t go there bro” doesn’t cut it.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I was born without the internet and I can die without it too. Perhaps using some bank apps I guess. Some things are required. Most are not.

        But sure, I would love if people could do something, but we never can.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          You were born to a world without the internet. It’s easy to get along without something in a world where it doesn’t exist or otherwise isn’t important. Existing without the internet today would be orders of magnitude more difficult.

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Not for me, and it’s my experience im talking about here. How can it be “difficult” to not use the internet? That’s a very low bar for difficult isn’t it?

        • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          What device are you using that banking app on? Cause it’s gonna be Apple or Android and none of the de-googled things either. With what account?

          Want to apply for a job? When did you do that the last time without it requiring the internet?

          Rent a place to live? Better fill out some forms online.

          Want to travel internationally? Where are you getting your tickets?

          Face it, you might have been born without the internet but it has become an absolutely essential part of a normal, daily life.

          • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            If banking is your one issue, back in the day, Kevin Mitnick recommended just buying the cheapest new Chromebook you could find, and using it exclusively for banking. ZERO other uses. Never browse the web with it. Just boot it, do your banking, and shut it off, then leave it secured at home.

  • ResistingArrest@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m uncertain about the future of computing. However, I know that the new laws are meant to control people. They can’t control bots, and they can’t control servers, because those machines aren’t owned by individuals, they can’t be identified and linked to individual real people. Therefore the solution to me seems to be posing as an unmanned machine.