Would splitting one single atom in a non dense environment start a nuclear chain reaction? And why do I ask such questions when it’s simply a cartoon to snicker about?
A nuclear reaction can only be sustained through very specific molecules that have the ability to undergo fission and release neutrons while they do. Those released neutrons then need to interact with new fissile molecules that surround the first one.
The chain reaction also requires that there are enough of those molecules and that they are packed closely enough together, so the reaction doesn’t fizzle (no pun intended) out.
That only happens in an environment like enriched uranium, which is uranium with an artificially high percentage of U-235 that doesn’t occur naturally –at least not anymore.
no, there are lots of atoms splitting inside your body every second.
a single U-235 atom’s fission, releasing ~200MeV, (~30 picojoules), in ideal circumstances could maybe nudge a very small fine grain of sand (~ micrograms) enough to see movement (small fraction of a millimetre) under a microscope .
It takes months of refining to make nuclear fuel that’s suitable for sustaining a chain reaction.
it’s an interesting question, I’m glad I did the research checking that the orders of magnitude match!
I understand your confusion, since particles are ejected from the nucleus in both processes. Alpha decay may be a bit of a grey zone, since it expels a helium nucleus, so the atom is split into two very asymmetric parts, but it is generally not considered a fission process. Alpha decay and spontaneous fission are actually competing processes.
Beta decay is something else entirely where no protons or neutrons leave the core, so there is no fission to speak of.
And spontaneous fission is possible, but it’s extremely rare. For your example of Uranium, which is overwhelmingly (99.3%) U-238:
Spontaneous fission is extraordinarily rare on a per-atom basis. Uranium-238, the most common uranium isotope on Earth, has a spontaneous fission half-life of about 8.4 × 10¹⁵ years.
i believe there was some early speculation that the unprecedented temperature of the Trinity test might ignite the atmosphere, somehow making the nitrogen burn, but that would be a chemical reaction, not a nuclear reaction.
Would splitting one single atom in a non dense environment start a nuclear chain reaction? And why do I ask such questions when it’s simply a cartoon to snicker about?
A nuclear reaction can only be sustained through very specific molecules that have the ability to undergo fission and release neutrons while they do. Those released neutrons then need to interact with new fissile molecules that surround the first one.
The chain reaction also requires that there are enough of those molecules and that they are packed closely enough together, so the reaction doesn’t fizzle (no pun intended) out.
That only happens in an environment like enriched uranium, which is uranium with an artificially high percentage of U-235 that doesn’t occur naturally –at least not anymore.
no, there are lots of atoms splitting inside your body every second.
a single U-235 atom’s fission, releasing ~200MeV, (~30 picojoules), in ideal circumstances could maybe nudge a very small fine grain of sand (~ micrograms) enough to see movement (small fraction of a millimetre) under a microscope .
It takes months of refining to make nuclear fuel that’s suitable for sustaining a chain reaction.
it’s an interesting question, I’m glad I did the research checking that the orders of magnitude match!
There are no atoms splitting inside the body. Nuclear decay happens, but not nuclear fission.
Alpha and beta decay are types of fission.
I understand your confusion, since particles are ejected from the nucleus in both processes. Alpha decay may be a bit of a grey zone, since it expels a helium nucleus, so the atom is split into two very asymmetric parts, but it is generally not considered a fission process. Alpha decay and spontaneous fission are actually competing processes.
Beta decay is something else entirely where no protons or neutrons leave the core, so there is no fission to speak of.
And spontaneous fission is possible, but it’s extremely rare. For your example of Uranium, which is overwhelmingly (99.3%) U-238:
Source
So with the uranium in your example there is a non-zero chance of spontaneous fission occurring, but it’s very unlikely.
Was that not Albert Einstein’s fear regarding the bomb? That Earth’s atmosphere would simply ignite when exposed to the initial reaction?
I think our sitting here, snickering at a comic about a biblical nuclear explosion, is proof that it wouldn’t happen.
I thought he was trying to add bubbles to beer
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ra7oqFqj9uU
i believe there was some early speculation that the unprecedented temperature of the Trinity test might ignite the atmosphere, somehow making the nitrogen burn, but that would be a chemical reaction, not a nuclear reaction.