The people making these accusations simply believe, without investigation, that China is committing genocide against Uyghurs. Any pushback on this is labeled genocide denial, in bad faith, because none of them have done even a mildly critical review if what has happened in Xinjiang nor the truly absurd US state department/intelligence connections of the small and dishonest group of think tank grifters pushing that particular narrative.
There are no logs to post that would satisfy them. They seek to slander and avoid thought, not discuss the topic of genocide with any level of seriousness. This is about their egos, not any actual concern about Uyghurs. I’ve never even met one of these people who can name an element of Uyghur culture. They’re just a rhetorical weapon to these national chauvinists.
Well, right now PRC is still aggressively demanding shores and sea routes of other nations.
Your link seems to be to a wrong page, as it doesn’t lead to any sort of explanation on what shores and sea routes are supposedly being demanded. Are you talking about NATO blockading the PRC’s sea access and formulating that as if the PRC is the aggressor in this case?
I have seen some documentaries on mistreatment of Uyghurs
Okay? You can see documentaries claiming whatever their makers want. They don’t have to satisfy any sort of proof standards.
As it stands, not even your empire’s leadership believes that, so, to assert this, you have to know more than the most expensive military and spy operation in the world.
but I am talking about kittenzrulz123’s own genocide apologetics
What genocides were they supposedly being an apologist for?
Well, right now PRC is still aggressively demanding shores and sea routes of other nations.
Your link is just to a Lemmy search but I’m guessing you’re referring the SCS? And China isn’t really demanding the SCS it just plain has it.
I have seen some documentaries on mistreatment of Uyghur
That is just another link to a search on YouTube, not a documentary. But there was a concerted effort to produce spurious reports and manipulative documentaries so this could mean almost anything in terms of the accuracy of what you watched.
but I am talking about kittenzrulz123’s own genocide apologetics which lead to their removal in 196 as moderators.
Are you? You haven’t listed them and the only implication so far is that it’s being minimally media critical regarding accusations against China’s treatment of Uyghurs. A position that is correct and that I already explained can be twisted in bad faith to be labeled genocide denial. Why are you just repeating things? I already responded to this!
Am I lead to believe kittenzrulz123 would dismiss others concerns of genocide?
Your link is just to a Lemmy search but I’m guessing you’re referring the SCS?
It’s also doing exercises in Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, etc., why it’s not just SCS.
Are you?
that is indeed my inquiry…
You haven’t listed them
Jorunn did, not I. I fail to read China or Uyghurs anywhere in the screenshots. Could you show me which one I am missing?
???
Did kittenzrulz123 lie to you or something?
Ah, so you did engage in trickery by claiming that the PRC is the aggressor in this case when you were, in fact, talking about NATO blockading the PRC’s sea access.
… Malaysia, Philippines
Do you have sources with regards to the PRC “demanding” their shores and “sea routes”?
Jorunn did, not I
But you are the one making the assertion here as if you believe it. So, either you can list them, or you are just being obviously bad faith.
China has zero military exercises in Japan, Malaysia, or the Philippines.
that is indeed my inquiry…
You can’t name them you just demand evidence to the contrary vaguely.
Jorunn did
Except they didn’t. Those screenshots don’t show any genocide denial.
I fail to read China or Uyghurs anywhere in the screenshots. Could you show me which one I am missing?
I already did in another comment it’s just them saying they don’t think there’s scholarly consensus. Why does everyone else have to describe what kittenz actually said but you don’t? Produce actual quotes not screenshots that don’t deny genocide.
The people making these accusations simply believe, without investigation, that China is committing genocide against Uyghurs. Any pushback on this is labeled genocide denial, in bad faith, because none of them have done even a mildly critical review if what has happened in Xinjiang nor the truly absurd US state department/intelligence connections of the small and dishonest group of think tank grifters pushing that particular narrative.
There are no logs to post that would satisfy them. They seek to slander and avoid thought, not discuss the topic of genocide with any level of seriousness. This is about their egos, not any actual concern about Uyghurs. I’ve never even met one of these people who can name an element of Uyghur culture. They’re just a rhetorical weapon to these national chauvinists.
Well, right now PRC is still aggressively demanding shores and sea routes of other nations. I have seen some documentaries on mistreatment of Uyghurs, but I am talking about kittenzrulz123’s own genocide apologetics which lead to their removal in 196 as moderators. Am I lead to believe kittenzrulz123 would dismiss others concerns of genocide?
Your link seems to be to a wrong page, as it doesn’t lead to any sort of explanation on what shores and sea routes are supposedly being demanded. Are you talking about NATO blockading the PRC’s sea access and formulating that as if the PRC is the aggressor in this case?
Okay? You can see documentaries claiming whatever their makers want. They don’t have to satisfy any sort of proof standards.
As it stands, not even your empire’s leadership believes that, so, to assert this, you have to know more than the most expensive military and spy operation in the world.
What genocides were they supposedly being an apologist for?
Your link is just to a Lemmy search but I’m guessing you’re referring the SCS? And China isn’t really demanding the SCS it just plain has it.
That is just another link to a search on YouTube, not a documentary. But there was a concerted effort to produce spurious reports and manipulative documentaries so this could mean almost anything in terms of the accuracy of what you watched.
Are you? You haven’t listed them and the only implication so far is that it’s being minimally media critical regarding accusations against China’s treatment of Uyghurs. A position that is correct and that I already explained can be twisted in bad faith to be labeled genocide denial. Why are you just repeating things? I already responded to this!
???
Ah, so you did engage in trickery by claiming that the PRC is the aggressor in this case when you were, in fact, talking about NATO blockading the PRC’s sea access.
Do you have sources with regards to the PRC “demanding” their shores and “sea routes”?
But you are the one making the assertion here as if you believe it. So, either you can list them, or you are just being obviously bad faith.
What are you even talking about here?
China has zero military exercises in Japan, Malaysia, or the Philippines.
You can’t name them you just demand evidence to the contrary vaguely.
Except they didn’t. Those screenshots don’t show any genocide denial.
I already did in another comment it’s just them saying they don’t think there’s scholarly consensus. Why does everyone else have to describe what kittenz actually said but you don’t? Produce actual quotes not screenshots that don’t deny genocide.
PS you are messing up the quote feature.