• davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s actually a brilliant question, it could be for dumb things the poster has been asked or seen asked.

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It would just be screenshots of posts from here with snarky comments. I don’t think we really need that.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Would make sense to have a rule excluding “no stupid questions” and eli5-like communities from the sources. Perhaps even all of the fediverse.

  • smaximov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    [There are] no stupid questions

    vs.

    [There are] yes stupid questions

    The latter just doesn’t sound right.

  • TabbsTheBat (they/them)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “No stupid questions” was originally made as a space to ask questions that other communities might call you a moron for not knowing due to the perception of them as common knowledge/sense, so in that way any ask community outside of “no stupid questions” is “yes stupid questions” :p

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes, stupid questions are ones that could be answered by the information the asker already has with just a little thought. Its intellectual laziness

    That’s often confused with ignorance, where you lack some unknown piece of information to complete the puzzle