They could save millions by that move
I think you already know the answer because you asked the question.
The CEOs are the ones trying to convince everyone (investors really) that AI can replace humans to try to increase profits. That’s it.
LLMs/AI are fantastic tools, but that’s all they are. Just tools. The CEOs are selling the AI revolution fantasy.
They’re an entertainment technology, not a revolutionary business technology as they claim, so their maximum value is constrained by the boundaries of the entertainment market rather than being a significant fraction of the World’s Economy: basically they’ll at best have a Social Media Tech-sized Economic footprint, not an Industrial Revolution one.
However, that shit was sold to investors as an Economic Revolution and the investment footprint is proportional to that prospect and thus way bigger than it would be for “this will be as big as Social Media”, and by now all that’s left to try and keep that massive block of investment from crushing the far too narrow columnn or returns, is ever more desperate spinning of hopes and dreams fables.
Same reason religions demand you tithe but refuse to pay taxes, even though they don’t deny Christ said, “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and render unto God what is God’s,” which is to say, fulfil your obligations to the government before fulfilling your obligations to God.
Ok, but Ai, tho…
That’s a wild understanding but you do you
What part do you think is wild exactly? The rendering or the same reason bit?
That’s not what that verse means. It means leave government stuff to government and God centered stuff to God. He was differentiating between God and the government.
That’s certainly not a “wild understanding” as the other commenter describes it. I’ve heard that interpretation taught since I was a child to mean pay your taxes. And what are these religions telling you not to pay your taxes?
I think the use of “before” is debateable.
I never used that word.
… But OP certainly did
I love how there are so many meanings, and everyone believes theirs is the right one.
My dissertation chair wrote a book partially on this subject. He pointed out that the Qamranites (like John the Baptist) preached that everything in the holy land belonged to god and nothing belonged to caesar. In that vein, “render unto caesar that which is caesar’s and render unto god that which is god’s” translates to “fuck caesar”. Personally I have no dog in the fight, but this interpretation is a lot more fun.
Ha I love it, ill choose this one.
jesus confirmed shitlib
Cause LLMs can’t yet be nepo babies
they’re typically sociopaths, narcissists, or both. other people hardly exist
And their ai says they’re irreplaceable geniuses
GIGO or something
AI can’t roll around in a pool full of money.
Wait until they virtually roll in crypto.
I remember people talking about DAO during the crypto hype. That’s quite curious that techbros didn’t try to revive the concept with gen ai
The crypto bro’s whole premise is that other people’s computers are untrustworthy - the whole concept of a blockchain is that when someone declares a transaction, the other network members all verify its legitimacy by (at least) a simple majority.
They’re not going to just let Sam Altman or Elon Musk pilot their DAO. That’s someone else’s computer running the show!
AI models are not stupid to mess with such powerful people. They are together
lol no. Wrong on… so many levels.
Oh. Their job is harder to replace than some paltry programmer, who just copies code from SO anyway.
Yes, their knowledge is locked behind the iron gates of ivy laden stone walls. Bestowed upon only for those whose Daddy’s could afford to unlock it. Mere intelligence, artificial or otherwise, simply couldn’t comprehend the 200x worker value they provide.
That’s not really how it’s working out. What we’ll see more of are companies that are created using AI, where the people are basically working absolutely essential positions, while the AI handles most of the “executive” functions. The simple idea of AI coming in and “replacing” the CEO isn’t how it’s happening.
When somebody insists that the food they made is good and that you should have some but refuses to eat it themselves, you know that they’re lying and the food is shit.
oh hey, you were at the big family dinner last night.
it was my mother’s turn to cook and she didn’t eat anything. there was enough food, just it was really, really bad.
pro cooking tip for all y’all out there: never, and i do mean never, go into your spice cabinet and just grab seven random spices to season a dish. actually think about what you’re cooking.
she made rice with garam masala and cream of tartar, dill, garlic, basil. like what the fuck.
It could’ve worked, but one doesn’t do such risky culinary experimentations when cooking for others.
or ASKS them whether they want to be a test mouth. doesn’t make it the whole damn meal.
Kinda how anything with “gourmet” on it is shit?
Because you can’t scapegoat an AI when the business does something illegal.
They will
Lots of people are saying that AI isn’t that good, and that’s absolutely true.
To your question though, AI has been doing better at running companies than CEOs.
Who would’ve thought that the machine that’s great at making shit up and running with it would be good at the “job” of people that make shit up and run with it.
While AI is not good, people seem to have forgotten the fact that CEOs are also not good…and are complete idiots.
I keep reading “AI is better at doing … than the human” but I tried to code a simple HTML app and that fucker did a horrible job. I kept having to explain the same thing over and over and it kept giving me the wrong code. The company asked us to use this shit and I thought it would save me time… it took longer than if I just coded myself. For now my experience is not good
My exact experience as well. Tasks that need precision and accuracy it does not do well. We have to babysit it.
It’s a great demonstration of how what modern CEOs are really good at is bullshit rather than management.
If AI was anywhere close to that good, they wouldn’t be encouraging the masses to use it, they would be hoarding access for their own benefit.
