They could save millions by that move
It’s not that good.
Much of a CEO’s role is schmoozing with other rich assholes. AI can’t do that. Maybe once it can buy hookers and blow.
Every LLM bot I have tried is an expert at schmoozing. Even when I don’t want it to
I think you already know the answer because you asked the question.
The CEOs are the ones trying to convince everyone (investors really) that AI can replace humans to try to increase profits. That’s it.
LLMs/AI are fantastic tools, but that’s all they are. Just tools. The CEOs are selling the AI revolution fantasy.
They’re an entertainment technology, not a revolutionary business technology as they claim, so their maximum value is constrained by the boundaries of the entertainment market rather than being a significant fraction of the World’s Economy: basically they’ll at best have a Social Media Tech-sized Economic footprint, not an Industrial Revolution one.
However, that shit was sold to investors as an Economic Revolution and the investment footprint is proportional to that prospect and thus way bigger than it would be for “this will be as big as Social Media”, and by now all that’s left to try and keep that massive block of investment from crushing the far too narrow columnn or returns, is ever more desperate spinning of hopes and dreams fables.
Why would a CEO choose to stop receiving a paycheck?
Because the CEOs are the ones making the decisions
Cause LLMs can’t yet be nepo babies
they’re typically sociopaths, narcissists, or both. other people hardly exist
And their ai says they’re irreplaceable geniuses
GIGO or something
AI can’t roll around in a pool full of money.
Wait until they virtually roll in crypto.
I remember people talking about DAO during the crypto hype. That’s quite curious that techbros didn’t try to revive the concept with gen ai
The crypto bro’s whole premise is that other people’s computers are untrustworthy - the whole concept of a blockchain is that when someone declares a transaction, the other network members all verify its legitimacy by (at least) a simple majority.
They’re not going to just let Sam Altman or Elon Musk pilot their DAO. That’s someone else’s computer running the show!
AI models are not stupid to mess with such powerful people. They are together
lol no. Wrong on… so many levels.
Oh. Their job is harder to replace than some paltry programmer, who just copies code from SO anyway.
Yes, their knowledge is locked behind the iron gates of ivy laden stone walls. Bestowed upon only for those whose Daddy’s could afford to unlock it. Mere intelligence, artificial or otherwise, simply couldn’t comprehend the 200x worker value they provide.
Same reason religions demand you tithe but refuse to pay taxes, even though they don’t deny Christ said, “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and render unto God what is God’s,” which is to say, fulfil your obligations to the government before fulfilling your obligations to God.
jesus confirmed shitlib
Ok, but Ai, tho…
That’s a wild understanding but you do you
What part do you think is wild exactly? The rendering or the same reason bit?
That’s not what that verse means. It means leave government stuff to government and God centered stuff to God. He was differentiating between God and the government.
I love how there are so many meanings, and everyone believes theirs is the right one.
My dissertation chair wrote a book partially on this subject. He pointed out that the Qamranites (like John the Baptist) preached that everything in the holy land belonged to god and nothing belonged to caesar. In that vein, “render unto caesar that which is caesar’s and render unto god that which is god’s” translates to “fuck caesar”. Personally I have no dog in the fight, but this interpretation is a lot more fun.
Ha I love it, ill choose this one.
That’s certainly not a “wild understanding” as the other commenter describes it. I’ve heard that interpretation taught since I was a child to mean pay your taxes. And what are these religions telling you not to pay your taxes?
I think the use of “before” is debateable.
I never used that word.
deleted by creator
One of the weird things about ceos, in USA at least, is that one of their roles is to be the fall guy for the board if things go badly. If they screw up badly enough, it’s expected that they’ll find it hard to be hired as CEO elsewhere, which they use to justify outsize compensation plans. I’m not sure AI would fulfill that role, nor the schmoozing aspects
I’m my experience it’s pretty uncommon for a CEO to struggle finding a new position no matter what transpired at their previous company. Golden parachutes and failing upwards are way more common
because it’s not about how well a job can be done, it’s about running the fucking show.
Removed by mod
I keep reading “AI is better at doing … than the human” but I tried to code a simple HTML app and that fucker did a horrible job. I kept having to explain the same thing over and over and it kept giving me the wrong code. The company asked us to use this shit and I thought it would save me time… it took longer than if I just coded myself. For now my experience is not good
Removed by mod
It’s a great demonstration of how what modern CEOs are really good at is bullshit rather than management.
