return2ozma@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 days agoStudy reveals halving human population gradually could help Earthwww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square121linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkStudy reveals halving human population gradually could help Earthwww.independent.co.ukreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 days agomessage-square121linkfedilink
minus-squarealsimoneau@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·20 days agoThey don’t use nearly as much ressources as half the population. Come on now.
minus-squaregwulgg@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·20 days agoYou can go with them if you want to defend them so much
minus-squarealsimoneau@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·19 days agoI’m not defending them. They are horrible and should be guillotined. But it’s disingenuous to think that reducing our population by half wouldn’t have a greater impact. Feel free to provide sources to prove me wrong.
minus-squareMrMakabar@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·21 days agoThe article suggest halving the global population by 2200. So not some nuclear war or disease killing half of humans basically over night. So more Japan and less nuclear war.
minus-squareTollana1234567@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·20 days agojapanese made several series, scenarios over overpopulation. blue gender, evangelion,etc.
minus-squareSaorSaol@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·20 days agoRichest one percent are responsible for same level of climate warming as the 5 billion poorest people so yeah it would.
minus-squarealsimoneau@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·19 days agoRight, but we’re not talking about the poorest half here. Population is declining in Japan, Korea, Europe and North America. That’s not the poorest half by a long shot.
It wouldn’t though.
It would actually.
They don’t use nearly as much ressources as half the population. Come on now.
You can go with them if you want to defend them so much
I’m not defending them. They are horrible and should be guillotined.
But it’s disingenuous to think that reducing our population by half wouldn’t have a greater impact.
Feel free to provide sources to prove me wrong.
The article suggest halving the global population by 2200. So not some nuclear war or disease killing half of humans basically over night. So more Japan and less nuclear war.
japanese made several series, scenarios over overpopulation. blue gender, evangelion,etc.
Richest one percent are responsible for same level of climate warming as the 5 billion poorest people so yeah it would.
Right, but we’re not talking about the poorest half here.
Population is declining in Japan, Korea, Europe and North America. That’s not the poorest half by a long shot.