• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not interested in discussing anything else with you until you answer my other comment, because it seems to me that you just blatantly lied claiming you didn’t label the other user a tankie. If you blatantly lied about that conversation, then I should expect you’ll lie about this one too. Even now you’re labelling them a tankie again, after claiming not to.

    • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 hours ago

      TL;DR: “This comment you just made explains away my confusion so I refuse to respond to it because I am (pretending to be) confused about the other comment you made.”

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Oh look, you’re lying about this conversation too, just like you did the other one! I should know better than to engage with you liberals in good faith.

        • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Nope.

          Any reader can see you’re playing silly games. Allow me to make for one less reader of yours thanks to the beautiful Lemmy feature known as: Block.

          +1 in the bucket for my ongoing internal question of “Should I just block lemmy.ml?” Socialists are usually pretty cool, but it seems the tankies tend to flow from lemmy.ml more than other instances.

    • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not interested in discussing anything else with you until you answer my other comment, because it seems to me that you just blatantly lied claiming you didn’t label the other user a tankie.

      That’s because you have difficulties reading and comprehending English or logic.

      Even now you’re labelling them a tankie again, after claiming not to.

      Speaking of blatant lies…

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I actually agree with you on that. However, “being too prone to using Marxist definitions and terminology” does not warrant labelling them as a “tankie” or “Russian propagandist.”

        That’s not what I was asserting, no.

        Claiming that it’s a blatant lie after I described you calling them a tankie and you replied “that’s not what I was asserting,” wtf you’re just trolling.

        • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Claiming that it’s a blatant lie after I described you calling them a tankie and you replied “that’s not what I was asserting,” wtf you’re just trolling.

          You described why I called them a tankie, and your why was wrong.

          It’s not trolling, you’re just too thick or bad at English reading to figure it out.

          Hell, you don’t even read my comments before you downvote them and you call me the troll? Blocking you unless my most recent comment is an eye-opener and you apologize or get back on topic.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 hours ago

            I read all your comments before down voting them, and for the record I’m a native English speaker with a degree. It’s not my fault if you communicate unclearly and then refuse to clarify because “you don’t respect me.” And that when you finally did clarify, you explained that you didn’t call them a tankie for being too prone to Marxist definitions, but for using “definition gymnastics,” which entailed… being too prone to Marxist definitions.