When an Iranian official this week laid out a list of demands to end the war started by the United States and Israel, he added an item that hadn’t been on Tehran’s list before: recognition of Iran’s sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.

The narrow waterway through which a fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) ordinarily passes has emerged as the Islamic Republic’s most potent weapon. And it is now seeking to turn into both a source of potentially billions of dollars in annual revenue and a pressure point on the global economy.

Iran has long threatened to close the strait in case of an attack, but few expected it to follow through – or for it to prove so effective in disrupting global trade flows. The scale of the impact appears to have expanded Tehran’s ambitions, with the new demands suggesting it is seeking to turn that leverage into something more durable.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      That might ultimatelly be good for America and Americans, so why would Iran ever do something like that?

      I mean, if America was a society with humanitarian values were what’s happenned now with Trump was an exception, it would make sense, but historically the US has been in war most of its existence, of late most of it being in the Middle East causing the deaths of millions of civilians, and very few people in the US were actually against it as a question of principle and even now most are only against it because “American money”, “American lives” or “Gas prices in America” so it’s clearly not a society of good people who normally uphold good values and is just momentarilly under the control of evil people.

      The US is not a society where most people think that innocent lives are sacred, be it at home or abroad.

      • Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Because it’s basically a big “Fuck You” to Trump that they know he will never willingly agree to. So a tit-for-tat to Trump’s insane and unrealistic demands for Iran.

  • panthera_@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is the proposal that should be offered to Iran. Iran will be permitted to pursue its nuclear program as long as it’s for peaceful purposes. Iran will be strictly monitored for compliance. Any violation will result in invasion by the US, Europe, and any other nations willing to join in. If Iran agrees to the proposal, all sanctions will be immediately lifted. It’s unnecessary for Iran to have sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz. If sanctions are lifted, Iran will be making money from oil and other exports. Unlike Trump’s 15-point peace plan, mine is simple.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is basically just the Obama Iran deal. It was working pretty much exactly like this until Trump tore it up and began in multiple rounds attacking Iran.

      After this war, Iran has no reason to sign such a deal especially since Trump and Israel will just tear it up whenever they want. Iran needs security guarantees which your deal doesn’t provide.

      • panthera_@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Then I will include security guarantees. If the US and/or Israel attacks Iran while Iran is abiding by the agreement, Russia, China, and Europe would intervene militarily to protect Iran.

        • Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          How well did that work out for Ukraine?

          The realpolitik answer is always to get nukes before they can stop you. Look at how well it worked for Israel and North Korea.

          • panthera_@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yes, but the US and Israel can stop Iran from developing a nuclear bomb, but Trump should stop at that rather than demanding things such as ballistic missiles with limited range and no aid to organizations such as Hezbollah.

        • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Lol so now Russia China and Europe have to jump into militarily attack the US ? This is your plan? Well sounds solved to me.

          • panthera_@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            They don’t have to attack the US and/or Israel, just send troops to Iran. This would include not only ground troops but air and ground forces. Russia is near Iran. Seeking military forces would be easy.

              • panthera_@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                You said Iran would want security guarantees. This is it. Russia and China would definitely agree to it since Russia wouldn’t want an Iran controlled by the US and China needs Iranian oil.

                • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  China is getting Iranian oil right now and the US isn’t going to control Iran. Why would either of them commit to this? Pretending like you solved the problem when none of the incentives line up is ridiculous. Either of them could militarily defend Iran if they want to without commiting to a security guarantees for Iran. So why would they bind themselves unnecessarily?

  • MolochHorridus@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Seeing how well Iran did actually close and keep selectively closed the Strait of Hormuz it seems fair to give them the sovereignty.

        • rarsamx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Just when the “bad guys” are breaking it, when it’s our guys, breaking stupid international law is OK.

          • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            So both the US and Iran are breaking international law against each other.

            But Iran is also breaking the right given by international law against neutral nations in this conflict. By restricting their right to shipping. Those nations have every moral and legal right to complain about Iran.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Not really. You basically have to be either a superpower or a pariah state to do something like this and not be immediately pummeled into oblivion.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          They could just target any ships from or to Iranian ports or of nations which support Iran with artillery or drones.

          It’s exactly because it’s so stupidly easy to attack civilian ships in a space like that whilst it’s very hard to defend against it that Iran is able to do so even whilst under attack by American and Israel, so the country on the other side could do the same thing and only target Iranian or Iran-related ships.

          Two can play the “fuck the other side’s ship” game there.

          • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Exactly. 90% of Iran’s oil leave by sea, via Kharg island.

            If Iran turns to piracy by threatening “pay or we sink your ships” at all other nations, then all other nations should just confiscate all Iran’s ships in return.

            Oil revenues are 35% of Iran’s budget. This should not be a can of worms that Iran wants to open.