When an Iranian official this week laid out a list of demands to end the war started by the United States and Israel, he added an item that hadn’t been on Tehran’s list before: recognition of Iran’s sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.

The narrow waterway through which a fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) ordinarily passes has emerged as the Islamic Republic’s most potent weapon. And it is now seeking to turn into both a source of potentially billions of dollars in annual revenue and a pressure point on the global economy.

Iran has long threatened to close the strait in case of an attack, but few expected it to follow through – or for it to prove so effective in disrupting global trade flows. The scale of the impact appears to have expanded Tehran’s ambitions, with the new demands suggesting it is seeking to turn that leverage into something more durable.

  • MolochHorridus@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Seeing how well Iran did actually close and keep selectively closed the Strait of Hormuz it seems fair to give them the sovereignty.

        • rarsamx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Just when the “bad guys” are breaking it, when it’s our guys, breaking stupid international law is OK.

          • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            So both the US and Iran are breaking international law against each other.

            But Iran is also breaking the right given by international law against neutral nations in this conflict. By restricting their right to shipping. Those nations have every moral and legal right to complain about Iran.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Not really. You basically have to be either a superpower or a pariah state to do something like this and not be immediately pummeled into oblivion.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          They could just target any ships from or to Iranian ports or of nations which support Iran with artillery or drones.

          It’s exactly because it’s so stupidly easy to attack civilian ships in a space like that whilst it’s very hard to defend against it that Iran is able to do so even whilst under attack by American and Israel, so the country on the other side could do the same thing and only target Iranian or Iran-related ships.

          Two can play the “fuck the other side’s ship” game there.

          • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            Exactly. 90% of Iran’s oil leave by sea, via Kharg island.

            If Iran turns to piracy by threatening “pay or we sink your ships” at all other nations, then all other nations should just confiscate all Iran’s ships in return.

            Oil revenues are 35% of Iran’s budget. This should not be a can of worms that Iran wants to open.