People are just going to disagree with you, argue, insult you, and at the end, you’ve wasted your time for absolutely no gain to anyone. There’s no benefit to posting anything on Lemmy, unless you need external validation - either confirming your perspective, or seeking praise from a third party.

Exceptions are when your profile is associated with some larger organization, scheme with an obscure goal, is an attempt to gather information, or the literal goal is to waste time, your own or others.

This means that every post not meeting those exceptions is an altruistic act that you should consider being grateful for. Someone expended time and effort for the purpose of entertaining you, a complete stranger, they’ll likely never know and never meet. They wasted their own time so they could improve yours.

  • lasta@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    That’s a cynical way of looking at it. Plenty of posts here aim to inform, educate, share something the poster created or found interesting, discover new perspectives, or have nuanced discussions.

    It’s a natural part of communication to want feedback or engagement with something you share. There are always going to be mixed reactions, with the strongest ones getting the most attention. If you are sensitive to criticism, the negative responses can damper what is overall a positive experience. I would not stay on a platform where I consider the overall experience a negative one.

    • BJW@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It is cynical, yes, but I think it’s also accurate. Those who post to inform, educate and share are acting altruistically and are the ones I specifically mentioned deserve gratitude.

      Lemmy is literally the only platform I’m on, if you don’t count email, and I debate deleting it on a weekly basis. Although it remains positive, overall, so I’m still here.