I wonder what happens if I search for Butthole Surfers?
If google believes I’ll find porn by looking up “naked” on youtube thu problem might be tht they forgot their content filters… Not the search
a while back I was looking for someone named “Molly Green” on Instagram and they said “we cannot complete this request. here are addiction treatment resources”
A while back I sent my buddy a TikTok with the comment “this fucking killed me” and got an “if you are thinking about hurting yourself, here is the suicide prevention hotline” automated warning in the chat.
Searching for music from Psychedelic porn crumpets on youtube is also fun!
Psychedelic porn crumpets
no results
Such fun!
They even renamed their channel to Psychedelic Prn Crumpets
I think youtube just wants more people to create accounts, to force more and more views to be tied to IDable users.
springbok nude girls?
Edit: Just tried and I can’t search for them anymore. Fuck Google.
If you search “springbok girls”, you get about 50/50 results of them and the South Africa women’s national rugby team 😄
I forget exactly what I was searching for, but it had the word young in it. Google told me this is illegal and refused to do it.
Scared me off the whole Internet for like 2 days.
Same here, but on a different site ahem. The actor is literally listed under that name, so looking them up needs an actual query engineering to avoid looking like a pedo.
The Young Ones!
Searching for Bare Naked Ladies must be a nightmare.
Maybe if you make it two words. That’s not the name of the band though.
They probably have a filter for celebrity name + naked.
Same for Butthole Surfers
And Anal Cunt
There’s a pornogrind band called Cock and Ball Torture. It’s very difficult to find their music.
naked music? damn
I think that’s called “a capella”
The Scunthorpe problem strikes again.
That one seemed to be all about offending substrings in words.
I find this one even dumber actually because it’s simply dumb to censor the word “naked”, which isn’t even explicit, can be used figuratively, etc.
I think youtube just wants more people to create accounts.
Guess I won’t be using YouTube for my naked singularity research.
I’ve never heard of Sremovedhorp, so it’s not a removeding big problem after all
Thanks for the song rec! Love it!
Works for me…
Anything special about your account?
Family Link restriction or so?I also haven’t seen a “confirm your age” message up to now.
Maybe a country-specific restriction?
Where are you from?You’re logged in. The OP wasn’t.
Okay, I see, didn’t notice the “login” on the screenshot before.
But then it kinda makes sense that the the most restrictive default filters are active.No it doesn’t. It’s about friction. They want people logged in to better monitor them and collect their data. If someone uses their service while logged out the platforms make it difficult as possible in as many ways as possible to “encourage” people to create an account and log in. “Protecting the children” is just a satanic panic excuse. PARENTS are responsible for managing their children’s online activities. Expecting platform providers to be the arbitrators of morality for our kids (or for adults) is how we ended up with Elon Musk’s fucked up CSM generator on twixxer.
Tried it on the duckduckgo browser without an account and it didn’t work. Just said no results found.
It works just searching bif let down though, so no real issue. Also I have no issue typing naked in YT.
no real issue
Except for the censorship under the guise of “save the kids!”
you’re probably signed in already?
If we start using lbry instead of youtube, we wouldnt have that problem…
I assumed that was “Ibry” and not “LBRY.” Is it the former or the latter?
The characters in the comment are “LBRY.”
If those who have even heard about LBRY all started exclusively using it today, youtube wouldn’t even feel the traffic drop.
That is exactly the problem. I wander why much better platform is one that majority of people didnt even heard of. And much worse platform is the one that eweryone uses…?
Shouldnt we compare two by technology and see whic one is better instead of just using the popular one…? Because diference is huge!
I wander why much better platform is one that majority of people didnt even heard of
Do you…do you really wonder this? How, exactly, would you expect the masses to learn about something that has a zero dollar marketing budget?
Music companies have a revenue sharing deal with YouTube. Does it have one with lbry?
The nazi bar?
Definitely a big let down.
they definitely have the resources to whitelist valid combinations, but some shirt ran the numbers and decided it wouldn’t bring enough money in
Hey if it’s good enough for the US federal government to use to kill scientific studies, then it’s good enough for them
Playing devil’s rusted avocado, if I know anything about mature content submissions, they’ll latch onto any whitelisted combo as soon as it’s discovered and dilute the actual desired content.
but that’s also true of literally any other keyword out there. They wouldn’t particularly be driving any more traffic since that’s not what the user was searching for, they’d just be getting their whole site delisted.
Do a video search with “site:youtube.com” on the various Web search engines that have a video search.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Ayoutube.com+bif+naked+let+down&iar=videos
You don’t need to use YouTube’s search engine to search YouTube.
YT’s own search is garbage anyway. Whenever I try to use it, it’s completely useless. Language preferences are also non-existent anymore, it seems. Even if I set everything to English and the query is also in English, it still gives me only results in local language.
