“But I think one of the issues here is that if you’re going to opine on matters of theology, you’ve got to be careful. You’ve got to make sure it’s anchored in the truth, and that’s one of the things that I try to do, and it’s certainly something I would expect from the clergy, whether they’re Catholic or Protestant,” he added.

The pope and Donald Trump have exchanged barbs over the past several days, with the pope denouncing the war in Iran and Trump responding by saying Leo was “WEAK on crime” and “terrible for Foreign Policy.”

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Did you know God’s favorite son (David) murdered two hundred men so that he could remove their foreskins? He used them to purchase a bride (her price was 100 foreskins, but David doubled that because, well, you know, he just really likes murdering men and cutting off their foreskins).

      What kind of fruit is that? I dunno. maybe some kind of fruit roll-up

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          David WAS God’s favorite, and we are all the children of God, according to God.

          Are you calling God a liar? You’ll burn for that!

          Why does him not being Christian matter? What an odd thing to say!

          He’s God’s favorite (according to God). God’s favorite was a Jew, and the Son of God was also a Jew (and a rabbi, for that matter… note the capitalization of “Son” to elevate Jesus above any other sons of God, like David, the apple of God’s eye).

          This goes without saying, so you don’t need to mention it any further.

          At least Jews have an excuse, God appeared before them many times. Did God show Himself to any Christians? Not once! Christians are God’s rejects, it seems (He didn’t say that, this is my opinion, since God never appeared to Christians they can’t be that important).

          Unless you believe in the Book of Mormon, of course. Which is another can of worms. Worms that dyeth not, so to speak.

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Behold, I give unto you power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy: and nothing shall by any means hurt you. ~Luke 10:19

          Also, Jesus said you are immune to venom under His magical super powers, and this is why there are churches with snake handlers to this very day.

          It’s pretty funny, when the rattlers bite them they try to heal it with prayer before running to the ER.

          They don’t use King Cobras for some reason

  • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    If a core Catholic belief is the pope is infallible, especially in the domain of theology & religion, then why is Vance saying any of this? Sure seems like his “Catholicism” is name alone or perhaps his faith is more Protestant than he wants to admit. Or, he has values above his faith, and for a Catholic, that seems worse.

    Whatever, Jan.

      • pleb_maximus@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        The heretical couchfucker.

        On second thought, that might make him sound more metal. Maybe just couchfucker is enough.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      If a core Catholic belief is the pope is infallible

      It isn’t. That’s only when the Pope is speaking “ex cathedra” meaning “from the chair” which Pius IX defined as

      when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, [the Bishop of Rome] defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Oh it sounds to you like that does it? And you’re going to substitute your layman’s understanding of the topic for what Catholic scholars determine then? Go ahead and do an image search for “dunning kruger chart” and see if you can find where you fit on it.

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            I don’t know what I did to deserve being called stupid and I’d sure like to know so I can properly repent for my horrifying sin. Or maybe I’m beyond absolution. Who knows.

            • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              I didn’t call you stupid. But you are willing to take a very layman’s understanding of a technical subject’s jargon and think that you immediately understand it all. So use whatever adjective you feel applies there.

              • Lumidaub@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                14 days ago

                Then you should know that, generally, an invocation of Dunning-Kruger is understood as a veiled “you’re stupid”. Now you know.

                What jargon am I not understanding?

                • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  Then you should know that, generally, an invocation of Dunning-Kruger is understood as a veiled “you’re stupid”. Now you know.

                  If you have people frequently referring you to Dunning Kruger you may want to rethink things a bit.

                  What jargon am I not understanding?

                  I render my former answer. You don’t care to learn, I don’t care to teach.

    • Astrealix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Not justifying mr couch fucker, but I will point out: modern Catholic doctrine does not actually say the Pope is infallible. Rather, it is that he is infallible when speaking “ex cathedra”, literally “from the chair”, which is also like… weird with different peoples’ opinions on what is ex cathedra. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility

      • Astrealix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        on the other hand, Vance’s “catholicism” doesn’t even match the fucking Bible, so, yknow.

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Well, let’s be real… Catholicism doesn’t match the Bible, either.

          It’s a ridiculous book full of contradictions, so par for the course.

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        He can disagree with the pope but not disagree with the catechism and still consider himself catholic, and the pope is only restating the “Safeguarding Peace” chapter.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        modern Catholic doctrine does not actually say the Pope is infallible. Rather, it is that he is infallible

        • Astrealix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Yeah, pretty much. What, you expected consistency from the religious sect that has consistently had issues with child sexual abuse?

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            I hate to break it to you about other religions, too…

            Obviously the Catholic Church has a systemic problem, and given that it’s one of the largest religions on earth (and their molester shuffling), it’s more universal than in a lot of religions, and I’m not defending them. They’re only unique in scale though.

  • IratePirate@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    “Was God on the side of the Americans who liberated France from the Nazis? […] I certainly think the answer is yes."

    So, if you assume God did not like fascists in the 1940s - what makes you think he has changed his mind to now support you and your ilk, couch boy? That’s a mighty big plank to pull from that eye of yours.

      • IratePirate@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Strongly disagree. Previous administrations, yes. Bush, certainly. But not this one. For that, corruption and self-enrichment are too rampant and poorly camouflaged (if at all), disdain for democratic institutions too blatant, preparations for an authoritarian power grab too brazenly obvious. These guys know who they are and who they serve, and they don’t even feel the need to hide it any more. The mask is off.

  • finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I wasn’t aware the Pope was a law enforcement official, or a foreign policy official. Gosh, where would we be without these little gems Trump keeps dropping?

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    To a fucking POPE of all people… Jesus Dumbass Vance, go back to fucking sofas.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      What’s even crazier is people being surprised…

      Like, people honestly think conservatives are actually religious and they use religion to dictate their politics and not the other way around.

      • fred_garvin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Do you know any conservatives outside of memes. Of course you do, they just don’t want to deal with your hysteria.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          I have no idea what you’re talking about…

          But I know a lot more conservatives and “conservatives” then most people it’s unavoidable for me

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          I do! I have known many, and they seemed pretty cool with hysteria.

          JADE HELM OH NO OBAMA IS GONNA LOAD US ON TRAINS

        • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Wow, a three-day-old account. Welcome to Lemmy, Fred Garvin! I see you’ve quickly found your sea legs, lol.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      The Pope is only the Pope for Catholics. It’s not a universal Christian thing, many don’t place value on his words or accept what he says as accurate.

      Anyways they’re all complicit in child sex abuse scandals, so no one should listen to a word they say.

  • Manjushri@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Was God on the side of the Americans who liberated France from the Nazis? Was God on the side of the Americans who liberated Holocaust camps and liberated those, those innocent people, you know, those who had survived the Holocaust?

    What a silly question. It’s silly because it’s based on the idea that God is a being who would pick sides in the first place. It is generally commonly thought by believers that we are all God’s children. When your children get in a fight do you pick sides and cheer for one of them to kick the other’s ass? I would hope not. I would hope that, as a parent, you would step in and try and stop the fight.

    Assuming there is a God, I would hope he/she/it would just be terribly disappointed in all the children involved for not finding a way to settle their differences peacefully.

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I feel like there’s a really great Bob Dylan song that deals with this very topic… Maybe JD Vance should listen to it?

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s silly because it’s based on the idea that God is a being who would pick sides in the first place.

      If you read the Bible, you’ll find that God picked sides immediately, and has never stopped. He even has a “Chosen People”, you can’t possibly pick sides any further.

      We may all be God’s children, but remember, God is perfectly fine with murdering billions of His children, and not only that, He tortures them with Hell forever after. He can’t even let them die in peace.

      Yes, it is certainly silly, which makes it all the more horrifying