“But I think one of the issues here is that if you’re going to opine on matters of theology, you’ve got to be careful. You’ve got to make sure it’s anchored in the truth, and that’s one of the things that I try to do, and it’s certainly something I would expect from the clergy, whether they’re Catholic or Protestant,” he added.

The pope and Donald Trump have exchanged barbs over the past several days, with the pope denouncing the war in Iran and Trump responding by saying Leo was “WEAK on crime” and “terrible for Foreign Policy.”

    • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Take him into a backroom with promises of a soft couch.

      Then just fucking shoot him in the head. Lights out. No fanfare. Just gone.

    • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What funny to watch (I mean, gallows humor funny) is that as Trump gets weaker, the various temptations for Crown Prince Couchfucker to coup him just grow exponentially.

      I like to imagine Trump and Vance sitting across from each other, silently weighing each other up, Trump telling himself shit like “JD owes me everything, he wouldn’t,” and Vance just looking back across at Trump like Trump’s a couch.

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, it’s not. He’ll flourish.

      Watch and see!

      We can’t even get rid of Ted Cruz. They stay in office until they are half-dead (see Biden, Mitch, etc.)

  • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If a core Catholic belief is the pope is infallible, especially in the domain of theology & religion, then why is Vance saying any of this? Sure seems like his “Catholicism” is name alone or perhaps his faith is more Protestant than he wants to admit. Or, he has values above his faith, and for a Catholic, that seems worse.

    Whatever, Jan.

    • Astrealix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not justifying mr couch fucker, but I will point out: modern Catholic doctrine does not actually say the Pope is infallible. Rather, it is that he is infallible when speaking “ex cathedra”, literally “from the chair”, which is also like… weird with different peoples’ opinions on what is ex cathedra. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        modern Catholic doctrine does not actually say the Pope is infallible. Rather, it is that he is infallible

        • Astrealix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, pretty much. What, you expected consistency from the religious sect that has consistently had issues with child sexual abuse?

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I hate to break it to you about other religions, too…

            Obviously the Catholic Church has a systemic problem, and given that it’s one of the largest religions on earth (and their molester shuffling), it’s more universal than in a lot of religions, and I’m not defending them. They’re only unique in scale though.

      • Astrealix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        on the other hand, Vance’s “catholicism” doesn’t even match the fucking Bible, so, yknow.

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well, let’s be real… Catholicism doesn’t match the Bible, either.

          It’s a ridiculous book full of contradictions, so par for the course.

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        He can disagree with the pope but not disagree with the catechism and still consider himself catholic, and the pope is only restating the “Safeguarding Peace” chapter.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If a core Catholic belief is the pope is infallible

      It isn’t. That’s only when the Pope is speaking “ex cathedra” meaning “from the chair” which Pius IX defined as

      when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, [the Bishop of Rome] defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh it sounds to you like that does it? And you’re going to substitute your layman’s understanding of the topic for what Catholic scholars determine then? Go ahead and do an image search for “dunning kruger chart” and see if you can find where you fit on it.

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don’t know what I did to deserve being called stupid and I’d sure like to know so I can properly repent for my horrifying sin. Or maybe I’m beyond absolution. Who knows.

            • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I didn’t call you stupid. But you are willing to take a very layman’s understanding of a technical subject’s jargon and think that you immediately understand it all. So use whatever adjective you feel applies there.

              • Lumidaub@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Then you should know that, generally, an invocation of Dunning-Kruger is understood as a veiled “you’re stupid”. Now you know.

                What jargon am I not understanding?

                • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Then you should know that, generally, an invocation of Dunning-Kruger is understood as a veiled “you’re stupid”. Now you know.

                  If you have people frequently referring you to Dunning Kruger you may want to rethink things a bit.

                  What jargon am I not understanding?

                  I render my former answer. You don’t care to learn, I don’t care to teach.

      • pleb_maximus@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The heretical couchfucker.

        On second thought, that might make him sound more metal. Maybe just couchfucker is enough.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    JD Vance lying about his truthfulness and integrity, both of which are non-existent.

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Excuse me, but did Juliette Dianne Vance just challenge the Pope on theology?

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    To a fucking POPE of all people… Jesus Dumbass Vance, go back to fucking sofas.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Pope is only the Pope for Catholics. It’s not a universal Christian thing, many don’t place value on his words or accept what he says as accurate.

      Anyways they’re all complicit in child sex abuse scandals, so no one should listen to a word they say.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What’s even crazier is people being surprised…

      Like, people honestly think conservatives are actually religious and they use religion to dictate their politics and not the other way around.

      • fred_garvin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Do you know any conservatives outside of memes. Of course you do, they just don’t want to deal with your hysteria.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I have no idea what you’re talking about…

          But I know a lot more conservatives and “conservatives” then most people it’s unavoidable for me

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I do! I have known many, and they seemed pretty cool with hysteria.

          JADE HELM OH NO OBAMA IS GONNA LOAD US ON TRAINS

        • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Wow, a three-day-old account. Welcome to Lemmy, Fred Garvin! I see you’ve quickly found your sea legs, lol.

  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    imagine one of these perpetual liars saying the pope is a liar.

    I know it’s a long shot but I desperately hope some of them live to regret this behavior.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’re really going with ‘lets pick a moral fight with the Pope’.

    … I actually have trouble comprehending this, because it is so obviously a politically stupid thing to do.

    JD is apparently considerably more lost in the sauce than I thought, has od’d on his own fart sniffing.

    It really is wild how immesenly hubristic this all is, but it does serve as a very useful illustration to the rest of the world to drive home the idea that American Christians ™ quite literally think they speak with the authority of God himself, which is broadly regarded as insane heresy by most other Christians in most of the world.

    They’re idiot fascists to the core, and its like 30% of the country that is this way.

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      “they’re very low IQ.” “Stupid” “losers” all of these weak insults, and they never, ever give examples of such. “How so are they losers?” “What makes you say they’re stupid?” There’s never any push back. These are the things a bully says because they’re insecure and don’t know why. There’s no evidence or thought given to these insults.

      How is the Pope weak on crime? Show me when the Pope said Iran should have nukes. This is the most basic push back. The media just lets him say whatever without questioning it.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Fascists don’t use language the way normal people do.

        They don’t believe in ‘truth’ or ‘reality’ as most people understand it.

        They believe that things just are the way they say they are, because they said so.

        They primarily use rhetoric, and pathos.

        Logos, logic, actually being correct or truthful… they only employ these things to the extent that they can aid either a rhetorical or emotional appeal.

        Their entire strategy is ‘create a collective delusion / cult that appeals to the weak and gullible’.

        Trying to evaluate the things they say, logically, is generally a waste of time.

        The proper way to converse with a fascist is by breaking their jaw with a baseball bat, to disarm them of their weaponized nonsense projection machines.

        Fascists believe language is a weapon, not a means of having a discussion.

        Their real language is violence, so you must commincate with them in their native tongue, to succesfully convey any ‘meaning’ to them.