VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Cool Guides@lemmy.caEnglish · 14 days agoThe paradox of tolerancediscuss.onlineimagemessage-square147linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageThe paradox of tolerancediscuss.onlineVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Cool Guides@lemmy.caEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square147linkfedilink
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·13 days agothat is legally forcing intolerance though, not tolerance. Legally forced tolerance is like the first amendment to the constitution that legally protects all political beliefs including those that all women should be shot
minus-squareuntorquer@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·12 days ago“Any movement (of intolerance)… … must be outside the law.” Is what I’m getting at. When you create legal structure around that idea, you create a cudgel for the state to use on its citizens. Protesting genocide in palestine isn’t antiemetic, yet people are getting locked away as terrorists on the basis of “anti-discrimination” law. The first amendment is in direct opposition to the argument of this comic, if for no other reason than that single line of text.
that is legally forcing intolerance though, not tolerance. Legally forced tolerance is like the first amendment to the constitution that legally protects all political beliefs including those that all women should be shot
“Any movement (of intolerance)… … must be outside the law.” Is what I’m getting at.
When you create legal structure around that idea, you create a cudgel for the state to use on its citizens.
Protesting genocide in palestine isn’t antiemetic, yet people are getting locked away as terrorists on the basis of “anti-discrimination” law.
The first amendment is in direct opposition to the argument of this comic, if for no other reason than that single line of text.