After I made this unrelated post, I was informed by @MysticMushroom1776@lemmy.dbzer0.com that lemmy.dbzer0.com was a pro-genAI instance.

It was honestly shocking for me to hear that these two things can coexist and I would like to share the discussion which was correctly moved for being off topic from the above linked post.

I think we owe it to ourselves to discuss topics like this with an open mind.

Here is my statements in reply to MysticMushroom1776, I wasn’t able to record their reply before it was removed for being off topic bit I hope they can come here and we can continue the discussion.

Others, please also feel free to discuss with us.

'Wow, I didn’t know [that lemmy.dbzer0.com was a pro genAI instance] As an anarchist myself I have to say that is really disappointing.

Anarchist communities [especially in real life] need humans otherwise there is no community. GenAl is a stolen facsimile of a human who can never understand morals or praxis. It can never understand freedom or control. It will however poison our communities (look at what SpaceX/Anthropic is doing in Memphis, TN) make us more predictable (and thus easier to control) and isolate us from other humans within the community which is so important to us.

Even with the most moral genAl you can possibly have, one that is totally FOSS and self hosted on a single gaming GPU, a lot of this is still true.

Obviously, this is the wrong place but I have to ask, [prior to moving the discussion to this thread] what makes you think the extreme negatives of genAl (specifically to the anarchist community) can be excused?

… [I do not have a copy of mushroom’s reply]

I pirate and seed. I’m also a fan of the megathread And for the most part, I think data is data. However there is a big difference between my pirating a book like the Lord of the Rings (which is credited and I can see the title of) and how Meta scraped Anna’s archive and funneled all that data into an approximation of all combined work.

If I pirate the book, the Lord of the Rings to read it. I might enjoy it, I might talk about it to others, quote it, share it with my daughter, I might use the ring of power an an allegory for authoritarian control with a powerful technology, I might even decide to buy my own copies of the book.

What Meta did and then released as open source, won’t allow a person the freedom to do any of that. The works were consumed and are used in silence to camouflage as human thought. No credit will ever be contributed. And so no one can even hope to appreciate the original works that was used in training.

The other concerns I have with (local) genAI that I think are deeply important to anarchists specifically.

  • Isolation of humanity
  • severing of our ties to community
  • increasing predictability
  • method of control

Photo is genAI made and sourced from the following article:

Why Your AI Is a Terrible Anarchist

  • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So you think that humans can’t cause bad mentals states to other humans? You think animals can’t do that? You think humans can’t spread mis-information, or biases? Or do you think we should get rid of all humans too?

    Your strawman arguments bore me. No you muppet, I KNOW humans can spread misinformation, and LLMs make it so that it’s 1000x easier, and allow corporations to do so through their product without any accountability.

    LLMs USE electricity to produce art

    Flat out no they dont. They use electricity to make pictures in the style of human art. Because all they can do is copy the effort of humans that have unwillingly been used as training data.

    Do you have an actual point?

    Yes, your smartest friends aren’t throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks, theyre using their combined knowledge and experience to discern an accurate answer to a problem and if they don’t have the answers they can use that knowledge to find the answer efficiently. LLMs will guess the right words to say, then tell you they have the answer but immediately fall back the second its told that the answer was wrong.

    So humans can analyise large lines of code in a matter of seconds for cheap without doing it inacurrately? Humans can create dozens of pieces of art cheaply, in a matter of minutes without any inaccuracies? Humans can generate dozens of stories, cheaply, and in a matter of minutes with no mistakes?

    LLMs can’t do this. They are neither cheap nor accurate, they can merely use their training data to mimic human output.

    Computers. Printers. Tractors. Cars. Websites. Courts. Guns.

    These things all require humans that have trained to use these tools to perform their task accurately.

    I’m done with you, keep shilling for corporations to carry on ruining the planet for the sake of profits, politicians and the richest people alive all you like.