cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/74416381

The relevant section is blunt. “The Software is licensed to you, not sold,” the EULA states. “You are granted a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable, and personal license to play or use the Software for your private, non-commercial use on the system or device it was intended for.”

The terms also restrict renting, modifying, or obtaining games through unauthorised means. Nothing in there is new, technically. Sony’s EULA has always said this. The timing is what makes it land differently right now.

  • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    How old are you? Because no, there is no key to revoke for a UMD. There is no “banning” discs from a PSP.

    The fact you apparently are so young you aren’t aware things used to be different, is proving the point here.

    And more importantly, no the license was not the same; the physical disc fell under what is called the First Sale Doctrine:

    The first sale doctrine is a legal principle codified in U.S. copyright law at 17 U.S.C. § 109. It states that once a copyright owner sells or gives away a physical copy of a work, their control over the distribution of that specific copy ends.

    When companies began to use license keys for instance as a backdoor route to bypass it, it was a big legal deal.

    I think you’re confusing copyright ownership, which was always the same (since video games have existed, that is), with end user licenses, the nature of which are very different now.