You begin with the assumption that a God to be disproved exists. That’s where you went wrong. You decided to believe the God claim without evidence to back it up in the first place.
Asking for evidence against the existence of something is beginning with the assumption that thing exists to be disproven. That’s why everyone is asking what evidence there is FOR the existence of God. There isn’t any proof, so there’s no reason to assume a God exists, and thus there is nothing to dis-prove.
You begin with the assumption that a God to be disproved exists. That’s where you went wrong. You decided to believe the God claim without evidence to back it up in the first place.
when did i state that god exist?
I didn’t say you stated it. It is the assumption with which you began this argument.
my assumption??? I think you mean your assumption. cause I didnt state God exist
Asking for evidence against the existence of something is beginning with the assumption that thing exists to be disproven. That’s why everyone is asking what evidence there is FOR the existence of God. There isn’t any proof, so there’s no reason to assume a God exists, and thus there is nothing to dis-prove.