Do the creators realize the safe site address is on here 1 time in small font, while the unsafe address is on here 6 times in big font? The good site should be equal size.
typically I would agree with you. this is a poster to bring awareness to information that has already been published from votesafe. the key is, “votesafe is not safe”.
Agreed. But that’s on there 6 times. One IDF.org at equal size, but separated in a different color or italicized would be better heirarchy, and be more clear and keep that repetition idea intact. And then the explainer can be split up, so the good part is also emphasized more, under the good address.
At the moment every piece of the good info is buried.
Do the creators realize the safe site address is on here 1 time in small font, while the unsafe address is on here 6 times in big font? The good site should be equal size.
typically I would agree with you. this is a poster to bring awareness to information that has already been published from votesafe. the key is, “votesafe is not safe”.
Agreed. But that’s on there 6 times. One IDF.org at equal size, but separated in a different color or italicized would be better heirarchy, and be more clear and keep that repetition idea intact. And then the explainer can be split up, so the good part is also emphasized more, under the good address.
At the moment every piece of the good info is buried.
I think the most important information is clear. I don’t think they care about driving traffic to their site, just about protecting voters.
also, why did you link idf instead of LDF?
you realize idf is Israeli Defense Force, right?
That, but maybe make LDF.vote green instead of red?