• BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Why not just put the solar panel next to the window so you don’t have to cover it at all? The more light a panel absorbes, the more efficient it is, which is kind of the exact opposite type of thing that you would want to cover a window with if you still want it to be a window. I’m not even going to bother addressing the inefficiencies of harvesting indoor light, other than to say it’s idiotic.

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I mean, couldn’t you take a solar panel and make it like an awning above the window or something? Have a system where it can pull into the window to be flush with the building if you want.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        You want to use solar panels to both collect solar energy AND provide shade to residents within the building? Sounds a bit too efficient for my tastes. Let’s put ugly brown tints on the windows instead and collect a fraction of the energy at 10x the cost.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      This seems more like an alternative to tinting films. So you can harvest the energy that would otherwise be lost.