• fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    It’s becoming increasing obvious how desperate the elites are getting, now that every woman isn’t churning out 5+ children for the meat grinder.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      This is Niger, where the mean women has like 7, meaning many have more. IIRC it’s the highest rate in the world. It’s also one of the poorest countries, so there’s no real reason they’d want more.

      • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Isn’t Africa rather thinly populated in general, or do i remember that wrong?

        Edit: just checked, Niger has 23 people/km², while germany has 230 pp/km².

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Yeah, Niger is desert, basically. There’s a bit of sahel at one end, and of course oases, but it’s not a populous place, because of course it isn’t.

          1/10 of German density is actually impressive as hell, and probably why they’re poor even by African standards. Australia might be a better geographic parallel, at 3.7.

          If you look at Nigeria, the story is different. Some of the small West African states are going to be even more crowded. Africa as a whole is probably comparable to the next continent. You’re averaging over a lot of very different places, once you get to that scale.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              Thanks! Hopefully people can pick out the Sahara themselves, while the red blob in west Africa would be mostly Nigeria.

              Same story in both of the Americas, at least. Few people live in the Canadian arctic or the Amazon, plenty live in the New York or Sao Paolo area.

              Asia has those mega-population spots, but the empty part is also bigger. With it sitting in front of me the mega-population spots still probably win. Non-Russia Europe is the same size and rough shape as India, but as a “continent” it’s pretty dense. while Australia and of course Antarctica are emptier.

          • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            Yeah, Niger is desert, basically. There’s a bit of sahel at one end, and of course oases, but it’s not a populous place, because of course it isn’t.

            that ok, i understand. but how do you explain that the Democratic Republic of the Congo has 48 pp/km²? that one is surely no desert.

            • cameroon 39.7 pp/km²
            • Central African Republic 8.6 pp/km²
            • Gabon 10 pp/km²

            these are all central africa, surely no sahara desert there.

            again, germany, 230 pp/km² for comparison.

      • fireweed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Mild conspiracy alert time, but:

        Increased diplomatic ties with Russia + Russia is desperate for more soldiers = keep churning out those future military contractors

        Also much of that region of Africa (Niger included) is highly unstable; there’s always the possibility of more localized geopolitical concerns promoting a population arms race.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Going more by Occam’s razor, and a bit of Hanlon’s: They copy-pasted every queer term they could find, and dumped it into the gay-bad bill. The junta may or may not have known what asexual even is.

          It’s an islamic country, which also has evangelical missionary influence, and positions itself as anti-Western, so that’s a great way to win political points. Now, poorly written laws like that would be a problem… if they had rule of law and working courts in the first place, which they don’t.

          • fireweed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            This is also highly likely. Anti-LGBTQIA+ folks aren’t exactly known for being well-versed in their queer terminology, and I can totally see the “A” (hell, probably the “I” too) getting swept up in general anti-queer measures, even when it’s nonsensical.