Fire in the hole!

  • _stranger_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    The difference is that Starfleet has the ethical standards in place to make that technology non disruptive to their society. We wouldn’t survive being gifted ships that can glass the planet, for example. Wed fuck that up immediately.

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    It, if it is imagined as using a similar underlying technology, would also be an example of that technology that is both far more mature and understood (at least until the writers want to use it as an excuse for whatever shenanigans of the day) than current AI tech, and more capable, and also not shoved into everything in an attempt to force people to use it so that it’s owners can extract more of everyone else’s shrinking supply of money, and also not part of an economic house of cards that people are told will eventually impoverish masses of people when it inevitability collapses.

    It’s like saying that in the 21st century we have decorative plants and everyone loves those, to a dutch person from the 1630s who has complaints about the tulip industry.

  • cattywampas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Commander Maddox had a point. If Data was a box on wheels they would have shipped him off to be taken apart. But because he looked and sounded like a human everyone empathized with him.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Perhaps we give it a pass in a post-scarcity world? When capitalism isn’t in the picture, it’s not taking jobs or ruining the environment or anything like that.

    Although, you kinda still have to “write” a holodeck program and it also seems to be slightly harder than prompting or they’d be doing it on the fly a bit more.

  • mossberg590@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    How many times did a bad “prompt” nearly destroy the Enterprise? Kill a crew member? Commit sexual harassment, for lack of a better term?

  • Randelung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Oh would you look at that, resources and copyright are less important in a literal post-scarcity universe where everything is shared freely! WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT!

      • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Yes but not all generative AI is LLMs. I hate wine, but saying “you know beer is alcohol too” is not something that should make me feel hypocritical about liking beer. It’s not alcohol I hate, it’s wine.

  • Murse@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Artificial intelligence in science fiction is intelligence that’s artificial.

    Artificial intelligence in real life is more akin to what we’d call “artificial flavors” in some fruit drink that contains 0% fruit. Isn’t fruit, doesn’t taste like fruit, but it’s purple and sweet, so fuck it: “grape”. We’ve accomplished the “artificial” part, but not the bit that actually matters.

    So, yeah, AI in sci-fi is unironically great. “AI” irl is shit. If the real version ever comes close to the sci-fi version, you’ll see a lot of the haters change our tune, but until then we’ll call a turd a turd.

    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      OK, but how will we ever get to “great” AI if we don’t invest in less great AI to drive research. If the luddites on Lemmy calls the shots, Data will never see the light of day.

      • SirActionSack@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        “research” doesn’t need billions of dollars in commercial data centres. The shitty “ai” we have is all about line must go up.

      • Murse@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Well, rolling with the artificial flavors analogy, we can start by stopping the infuriating trend of adding artificial grape flavor to every fucking food item under the sun. No one asked for or wanted that shit, but now it’s become a chore to find so much as a bag of coffee beans that doesn’t have some blip on the packaging advertising “Now with grape!!” Not only does it taste bad, but it’s caused the cost of food to fucking double.

        Second, we can start being honest about what it actually is. Again, it doesn’t taste like grape, so why the fuck are we calling it grape? With AI this is as much on us as it is with the companies marketing that garbage - for ages we’ve been calling so much as an NPC’s pathing algorithm in a videogame “AI” even though there’s objectively no intelligence at play. We’ve since tried to move the goal posts a bit by relabeling actual AI as “AGI” but I guarantee that’ll just become another term to muddy the waters with marketing bullshit. The shit we’re calling “AI” is just categorically not even on the same path as the the kind of AI we see in sci-fi. So if you want Data to see the light of day, we’ll need to stop wasting our time and money on what is effectively a spell checker that’s wrong occasionally.

        Unless you think Data is just a chat bot with no consciousness, in which case, hooray, we’ve done it: AI. 🎉 …now can I please have a mug of coffee without Grape™ syrup in it? I know, such a Luddite, drinking coffee without grape! Guilty as charged. But adding that shit to my coffee is never going to get us a product that tastes and feels etc like a grape, so if that’s what you’re after, maybe keep it in R&D and off the fucking grocery shelves.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    “Make an opponent capable of defeating Data”

    ST AI: Have a supercharged Moriarty.

    RL AI: deletes production database

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    No holodecks, or more accurately, the ship’s computer, are fantasy AI. Chatbots will never be so cool.

    • DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      There was this old book in my school classroom I remember that was speculating about the future; it had illustrations of robot butlers and maids helping people about the house in that 1960s-painting style. Think the future as seen in “The Jetsons”, or Andrew from “Bicentennial Man”.

      That’s the “robot assistance” I was promised. So I’d say to my robot “Hey, can you turn the lights down?” And a humanoid robot would walk over to the light switch and turn the lights down.

      Of course, it turns out building robots like that is hugely expensive so it’s easier to just sell smart lights that connect to a voice-activated app on your phone. That’s just not the same as a true general purpose robot, dammit! There’s no whimsy. Generative AI is ruining the Internet and for what? I’m no closer to my true robot butler and flying car.

  • Labna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Wrong, the holodeck follow instructions, the AI neural simulation don’t.

    Unless you like to play in simulation created by a simulation, coded with an abstract language, run into a virtual machine.
    At some point in time, humanity will learn.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Now this might have something to do with what they mean when they disable safeguards. Maybe there’s a layer of user-defined limits that are carefully defined and that’s part of the craft of a good holodeck program, but when safeguards are disabled, it just runs as a raw universe simulation, matter, photons and all.