ITT I learn that oligarch gabe nawel is the elon musk of gamers

  • Taasz/Woof@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I mean what, am I supposed to be ‘preemptively mad’ because they might become worse one day?

    Like I don’t understand why I’m supposed to be mad, it’s a service that’s useful and good, maybe it won’t be one day but what am I going to do about that?

    • HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      “preemptively mad” got a chuckle out of me, yeah it’s premature to say that we should get big angy at Steam.

      The word we should be looking for is “Critical.” Valve is a huge company, they are not saints, and we should treat them with skepticism as a matter of course. But that doesn’t mean they don’t do positive, thankless work for consumers too (in the form of Proton, Linux support, etc).

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      The first step of enshittification is being very pro-user. All of the good will from your users will build you a dominant market position so you can squeeze them later. We should resist any company dominating any market. Just because valve hasn’t screwed you over personally doesn’t mean we should just lovingly accept market dominance. The more competitive the market, the better.

      • athatet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        The first step of not enshit would also have to be pro user otherwise it’s just shit to begin with.

        • JillyB@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          I’m not saying they for sure will get worse. I’m saying that a market dominance gives them the incentive and ability to do it. In general, we should resist market dominance so that incentive and ability just isn’t there to begin with.