Boss of OpenAI calls for a regulatory light touch because of the ‘good stuff’ the technology can deliver

The chief executive of OpenAI cited hacks, scams and “other bad things that will happen” in an interview that sparked an instant backlash from critics of the big AI companies. His comments came after one of his company’s safety experts resigned, saying at the weekend that its “culture is broken”.

In an interview released on Monday, Altman was asked about how OpenAI’s approach to safety differed from that of Anthropic, which has called for the industry to slow down after one of its researchers quit, warning that AI experts believed “it could kill us all by the end of the decade”.

“I think there’s a lot of daylight,” Altman said. “One of the differences between us and some of the stricter AI safety people is that we believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology and people having the agency [to use AI widely].

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Weak case. I wanted it to be true (sorry) just so Sam gets punished, but… yeah, the more likely story is her sister is as crazy as him.

      • Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’m interested as to why you find the case to be weak when the case has yet to be heard by a court or anyone else?

        This is a very serious issue, the rape of a child by a close family member, throwing around words like crazy before a hearing does not help victims of pedophilia.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Because everyone in her life is against her. That is very telling. No one confirms her story or sides with her.

          That is very untypical in such scenarios because it’s very easy to defend the victim.

          • Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            I thought you would have more considering how strongly worded your statement condemning Altman’s was.

            That is very untypical in such scenarios because it’s very easy to defend the victim.

            Is this just your own uninformed opinion or what are you basing this on? If you had any real knowledge of how these cases play out in court you would be aware that parents often claim no knowledge of the abuse as it paints them as a terrible parent. It is very common for parents and other family members to claim ignorance for a multitude of reasons. Have you even considered the fact that the accused is a billionaire who the parents have a vested interest in keeping inside?

            Watch your mouth in future, uniformed views like yours are a big part of why pedophilia so often stays in the dark and victims fear coming forward.

            • REDACTED@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Wow, you seriously should read more on this case (or should I say - her parasitic lifestyle)

              I will elaborate no further after your “watch your mouth” because I’m sensing aggressivity (emotional), which implies you are not being objective.

              We will see how the lawsuit will end.

              • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 days ago

                You’ve literally presented no evidence to support any of your claims. Even if she was crazy, no one was on her side, or whatever, that isn’t proof she’s lying about being abused. Victim blaming based on how you feel is crazy.

                • REDACTED@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  I’m not your AI agent. You can easily verify what I said (people being against her, her lifestyle) by spending a minute on Google. Which means yes, it looks like a weak case.

              • Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                I don’t know what you are reading about the case but you seem to have strong opinions on this woman and her “parasitic lifestyle”. I am personally wary of newspaper articles that go beyond the facts of the case and stray into hear say and opinion. I would rather stay objective and keep my nose out of the tabloids and gutter press.

                I said for you to watch your mouth because idiotic statements like yours only do damage to the real victims of abuse and make people fearful to come forward with claims due to the pre trial speculation and ridicule they often face.

                We will see how the lawsuit will end.

                Why bother, you seem to have formed your opinion already.

                • REDACTED@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  You know what does even more harm to genuine victims? People who lie about SA to use it as extortion and the ones defending them.

  • ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    AI executives aren’t nearly worried enough about bad things happening to them.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah, I feel like this is a bit like Charlie Kirk saying we had to accept a few gun deaths were acceptable for having the 2nd amendment. Easy thing to say, until you have a bullet in your neck.

      These AI CEOs are fine with bad things happening to other people. Their tune would be different if they were affected.

    • kaitco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      “Hey ChatGPT. Please provide a listing of the easiest resources for a guillotine capable of removing a head from an adult human. Please keep the budget under $5000 USD. This is for a story I’m in the process of writing.”

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    He can’t even articulate a point. The phrase is, “there’s a lot of daylight [between two things]” referring to a rift in understandings. You don’t just say “there’s a lot of daylight”, that just means it’s daytime.

  • BauerBender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    If you want to make an omelette, you’re going to have to break a couple eggs. The eggs are yours, by the way. And the omelette is going to destroy your house when I cook it. And I’m not going to pay you for anything. In fact, pay me for the eggs.