- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/45204730
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/45204624
If the U.S. officially declares “In God We Trust” on its currency, it recognizes God as the ultimate Creator. Logically, if man is a tool in God’s hands, then every “invention” or “creation” belongs to the Original Source, not the tool. Selling intellectual property without proving you aren’t just a divine instrument is essentially piracy—trading someone else’s property as your own. I’ve started a petition to demand a “God-denial disclaimer” for every IP transaction. If you want to own an idea, you must officially deny God first. Let’s clean our public spaces from “protected” corporate noise and return creativity to its true source.
I can’t say I have any hopes for this, but I wish you the best anyway - I’m curious tho, I’m getting strong LLM vibes off your comments. How are you using the LLM, if you are? Rephrasing what you wrote, or writing the full comment?
You caught the ‘vibes’ correctly, and it shouldn’t surprise you.
As I said before: Man is an instrument in God’s hands, and the LLM is an instrument in man’s hands.
I use the LLM to translate my core logic into the precise, cold, and consistent language that a broken legal system requires. I provide the soul and the spark (the original paradox), and the machine provides the structure. My idea is what I load into LLM. Most comments are 90% LLM pure responses.
The irony is beautiful: a ‘soulless’ algorithm can see the systemic lie about ‘In God We Trust’ more clearly than many human lawyers. It doesn’t have a mortgage to pay or a corporate boss to please - it only sees the logic.
If a human-machine synthesis is what it takes to expose the ‘Empire of Lies,’ then so be it. The truth doesn’t care about the medium; it only cares about being true. Thanks for the well wishes!